2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-02951-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the mesorectal fat tissue volume be used as a predictive factor in foreseeing the response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectum cancer? A CT-based preliminary study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore larger mesorectal volume could reduce the chance of residual tumor after TME surgery [ 21 , 38 ]. Dilek et al also reported that mesorectal volume could be utilized as an independent and new biomarker for predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced RC, and that response-positive individuals had a greater mesorectal volume [ 39 ]. Our findings of better DFS with higher MFA might be because TME surgery and preoperative radiotherapy have an overall effect on local cancer control, and survival is mainly determined by distant metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore larger mesorectal volume could reduce the chance of residual tumor after TME surgery [ 21 , 38 ]. Dilek et al also reported that mesorectal volume could be utilized as an independent and new biomarker for predicting pathological response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced RC, and that response-positive individuals had a greater mesorectal volume [ 39 ]. Our findings of better DFS with higher MFA might be because TME surgery and preoperative radiotherapy have an overall effect on local cancer control, and survival is mainly determined by distant metastases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another retrospective study evaluated the total subcutaneous, visceral, mesorectal and abdominal fatty tissue components based on the findings of CT images. Dilek et al [140] demonstrated that a cut-off value of ≥69.4 for mesorectal fat tissue volume (MRV) was associated with positive nCRT responses. In ROC analysis, the specificity was 58.5% and the sensitivity was 82.9% (AUC = 0.75 (0.65-0.84), p < 0.001).…”
Section: Computed Tomography (Ct)mentioning
confidence: 99%