2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.physletb.2023.138013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the PREX-2 and CREX results be understood by relativistic mean-field models with the astrophysical constraints?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that when we include only recently measured Δr np ( 208 Pb = 0.283± 0.071 fm) from PREX-II results [25] in our fitting data to constrain the linear density dependence of symmetry energy, a larger value of neutron skin thickness Δr np = 0.196 fm for 48 Ca is obtained for NL-RS model and is significantly overestimated the CREX results [25]. The reason might be that the PREX-II data suggests relatively stiff values of L whereas CREX data suggest very softness of linear density dependence of symmetry energy as also discussed in [34,[60][61][62][63]. The Δr np for 48 Ca predicted by the NL-RS model overestimates the recently reported value by CREX results and the serious tension between CREX and PREX-II measurements continues as also discussed in [60][61][62][63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This implies that when we include only recently measured Δr np ( 208 Pb = 0.283± 0.071 fm) from PREX-II results [25] in our fitting data to constrain the linear density dependence of symmetry energy, a larger value of neutron skin thickness Δr np = 0.196 fm for 48 Ca is obtained for NL-RS model and is significantly overestimated the CREX results [25]. The reason might be that the PREX-II data suggests relatively stiff values of L whereas CREX data suggest very softness of linear density dependence of symmetry energy as also discussed in [34,[60][61][62][63]. The Δr np for 48 Ca predicted by the NL-RS model overestimates the recently reported value by CREX results and the serious tension between CREX and PREX-II measurements continues as also discussed in [60][61][62][63].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…Also as reported in [34,[58][59][60][61][62] that it is difficult to produce CREX and PREX-II results simultaneously and the CREX results push the value of L towards a lower value, while PREX-II shifts it towards a higher value. It is also reported in [34,62,63] that it is very difficult to understand the PREX-II and CREX results simultaneously within relativistic mean field models. So it puts serious tension to fit CREX and PREX-II data simultaneously without compromising the properties of finite nuclei, bulk nuclear, and dense matter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[19], but without spin-orbit cor- rections. As shown, the charge radius of Ca is larger than that of experiments [31]. If the neutron skin thickness of Pb is forced to be thick, the charge radius of Pb becomes smaller.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The experiments of neutron skin thickness are taken from PREX-II[2] and CREX[16]. The experimental charge radii are taken from[31].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%