2015
DOI: 10.1071/ah14123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the simple clinical score usefully predict the mortality risk and length of stay for a recently admitted patient?

Abstract: There was no useful prospective role for the SCS in predicting LOS and mortality of in-patients newly admitted to a General Medicine service.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the SCS has been reported as inferior to assessments made by clinical physicians. 4 Another tool is the PRO-AGE scoring system, a predictive model for the hospitalisation and long-term stay of older patients admitted from emergency departments. 5 As an example, when used in scoring men who are ≥90 years old, had been hospitalised in the previous 6 months, had experienced weight loss of ≥5% in the previous year and who showed acute mental alteration, acute functional decline and fatigue, this system predicted hospitalisation of 7 days or more, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.79.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the SCS has been reported as inferior to assessments made by clinical physicians. 4 Another tool is the PRO-AGE scoring system, a predictive model for the hospitalisation and long-term stay of older patients admitted from emergency departments. 5 As an example, when used in scoring men who are ≥90 years old, had been hospitalised in the previous 6 months, had experienced weight loss of ≥5% in the previous year and who showed acute mental alteration, acute functional decline and fatigue, this system predicted hospitalisation of 7 days or more, with a receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.79.…”
Section: Strengths and Limitations Of This Studymentioning
confidence: 99%