2020
DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i1.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can the wet suction technique change the efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for diagnosing autoimmune pancreatitis type 1? A prospective single-arm study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, 15 studies 8 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 with 631 patients were included in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, 15 studies 8 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 with 631 patients were included in the meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recruitment period ranged from 1997 to 2018. Five studies 8 13 17 18 21 were prospective, of which one was a randomized-controlled trial (RCT) 8 , and ten were retrospective series 14 15 16 19 20 22 23 24 25 26 . Six studies tested 22G FNA needles 13 14 15 16 17 18 , one study the 19G FNA needle 19 , one study compared wet suction with either 19G and 22G FNA versus dry suction 21 , and another series did not specify the FNA device used 20 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The wet technique involves flushing the needle with saline to replace the column of air within the lumen of the needle before needle aspiration, while a conventional EUS-FNA technique (so-called "dry suction technique; we defined this as "dry" technique in this article) applies negative pressure suction on an empty needle lumen after the stylet is removed. Several papers have reported on a wet EUS-FNA technique for various solid lesions such as mediastinal, pancreatic, nonpancreatic intra-abdominal, or pelvic cavity masses [7][8][9][10] and for liver biopsy [11,12] with improved tissue adequacy compared to the dry technique. However, no studies have reported on the use of the wet technique for UGI-SELs, for which it can be difficult to obtain specimens compared to lymph node and extraluminal masses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%