2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1417-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can This Prosthesis Be Saved?: Implant Salvage Attempts in Infected Primary TKA

Abstract: Background Open débridement with polyethylene liner exchange (ODPE) remains a relatively low morbidity option in acute infection of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but concerns regarding control of infection exist. We sought to identify factors that would predict control of infection after ODPE. Methods We identified 44 patients (44 knees) with culture-positive periprosthetic infection who underwent ODPE. Failure was defined as any reoperation performed for control of infection or the need for lifetime antibiot… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
90
5
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 141 publications
(103 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
90
5
7
Order By: Relevance
“…In certain clinical situations such as in early/acute infections, or when patients have major comorbidities making them poor operative candidates, retention of hardware can be selected. However, it has a lower rate of cure and patients usually require continued infection control and suppression via prolonged oral antibiotics [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In certain clinical situations such as in early/acute infections, or when patients have major comorbidities making them poor operative candidates, retention of hardware can be selected. However, it has a lower rate of cure and patients usually require continued infection control and suppression via prolonged oral antibiotics [13].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of infection after primary hip and knee arthroplasty has been reduced to 0.3% to 2% with modern aseptic techniques, but this has reached 20% in some revision procedures [17,20]. Currently, the preferred treatment for periprosthetic joint infection is a two-staged revision arthroplasty with antibiotic spacer placement resulting from bacterial biofilm formation on the retained components [15,27,30]. Although effective, this method requires multiple surgical procedures, increases healthcare costs, limits mobility, and increases soft tissue and skeletal damage often resulting in additional reconstructive procedures at the time of replantation of permanent components [15,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mortality rates from complications related to deep prosthetic infections in THA and TKA are reportedly between 2.7% and 18%, 6 and infection is the most common reason for repeat surgery after otherwise successful prosthetic joint replacement. 7 The incidence of infection in THA and TKA may be increasing, probably due to improved detection and also because of evolving antibiotic-resistant bacteria strains. Treatment costs related to infected orthopedic implants can range from 1.52 to 1.76 times the cost of the original surgery.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%