Can topical beta‐blockers reduce the size of superficial infantile hemangiomas of the head and neck?

Bly, Randall A.; Perkins, Jonathan A.; Parikh, Sanjay R.

doi:10.1002/lary.26350

Cited by 7 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…When comparing the two test versions in the total sample of 152 people, the two versions slightly differed in the recall task and in the language ability task. 81 In line with that, Parada tested 21 cochlear-implanted subjects with a mean age of 68.9 with the MoCA and the HI-MoCA. Especially in the recall task, patients obtained significantly better scores in the HI-MoCA than in the original version.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 87%

“…Mean stands for mean age in years. Cognitive Assessment Tool Cognitive Domains Tested Advantages/ Disadvantages Data Pool References RBANS-H (delayed) recall visuospatial/ constructional language attention ↓ no assessment of executive functions ↓ not fully automatic data analysis computer-based reference data for the original version n=80 (mean 68.3) update for reference data n=415 (mean 71.1) reference data for RBANS-H in bilateral CI users n=61 (mean 71.5) Randolph 1998 102 Claes 2016 50 Olaithe 2019 103 HI-MoCA executive functions naming memory attention language abstraction delayed recall orientation ↓ only partially digitalized paper- and computer- based elements reference data for standard MoCA n=277 (mean n/a) reference data available for HI-MoCA in severely HI subjects n=49 (mean 70.2) Nasreddine 2005 58 Lin 2017 81 CANTAB memory working memory attention reaction time executive functions inhibition emotion psychomotor speed ↑ automatic data analysis computer-based reference data only for some subtests n=23 severely HI (mean 69.0) n=16 CI patients (mean 61.8) CANTAB ® Jayakody 2017 64 ALAcog attention (delayed) memory verbal fluency processing speed mental flexibility inhibition working memory ↑ pre-run ↑ automatic data analysis computer-based reference data for NH subjects n=80 (mean 65.6) reference data for bilateral severely HI subjects n=40 (mean 65.8) Falkenstein 1999 104 Wild-Wall 2011 105 Völ...…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Impact of Hearing Loss on Geriatric Assessment

Völter¹,

Götze²,

Dazert³

et al. 2020

CIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 87%

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Hearing Loss on Geriatric Assessment

Völter¹,

Götze²,

Dazert³

et al. 2020

CIA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This study assessed participants with VL, but not participants with HL, with a MoCA version adapted to their sensory impairment. Future research should investigate the effect of failing the MoCA for detecting HL and DSL, using the now available MoCA version adapted for respondents with HL [35]. Future research should expand the generalizability of findings by studying participants with a wider array of cognitive impairment levels and who are not receiving rehabilitation services.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Table 2 lists the tasks included in the MoCA and the corresponding cognitive areas they assess. After data collection had been completed, this study’s authors learned about the MoCA version adapted for individuals with hearing loss [35]. Consequently, this MoCA version was not included in this study’s measurements.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Detection of vision and /or hearing loss using the interRAI Community Health Assessment aligns well with common behavioral vision/hearing measurements

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study’s main objective was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of the interRAI Community Health Assessment (CHA) for detecting the presence of vision loss (VL), hearing loss (HL) or both (Dual Sensory Loss, DSL) when compared against performance-based measures of vision and hearing. The interRAI CHA and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were administered to 200 adults (61+ years of age) who had VL, HL or DSL. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the interRAI CHA for detecting sensory impairments using as the gold standard performance based measurements of hearing (pure-tone audiogram) and vision (distance acuity) as determined from the rehabilitation centre record. Results were divided according to participants’ cognitive status, as measured by the MoCA and the Cognitive Performance Scale (CPS, embedded within the interRAI CHA). Overall, sensitivity was 100% for VL, 97.1% for HL, and 96.9% for DSL. Specificity was at least 93% in all three groups. In participants who failed the MoCA (i.e., at risk of mild cognitive impairment), the sensitivity was 100% for VL, 96.8% for HL and 96.2% for DSL; in those who were not at risk, the sensitivity was 100% for VL, and 97.4% for HL and DSL. In participants classified by the CPS as borderline intact or mild cognitively impaired, sensitivity was 100% in all groups; in those classified as cognitively intact, sensitivity was 100% for VL, 97.0% for HL, and 96.8% for DSL. These results suggest that the interRAI CHA detects VL, HL, and DSL in high agreement with performance-based measurements of vision and hearing. The interRAI CHA shows high accuracy even in participants with mild cognitive difficulties. Since results were found in a specific population of older rehabilitation clients who all had sensory difficulties, further research is needed to understand its role in screening in other more diverse groups.

show abstract

“…Systemic propranolol has been widely studied in the management of infantile haemangiomas, which possesses risk of bronchospasm, bradycardia, hypotension, hypoglycaemic and cardiac failure. 15 Excision, cryotherapy and radiotherapy have also been described as management options. 16 We performed a review of literature and could find a total of 14 acquired bulbar conjunctival haemangiomas which is illustrated in table 1.…”

Section: Images In…mentioning

confidence: 99%