Can two-part tariffs promote efficient investment on next generation networks?

Brito, Duarte; Pereira, Pedro; Vareda, João

doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2009.10.004

Cited by 54 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 26 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…4 However, regulators also want low prices. Because prices are set after investment, the wish for lower prices creates an ex post conflict with the ex ante desire for high investment (Brito et al, 2008). Lack of commitment therefore leads to ex post policies detrimental to investment.…”

Section: Basic Considerations About Regulation and Investmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Incentive Regulation, Investments and Technological Change

Vogelsang¹

2012

Regulation and the Performance of Communication and Information Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. Terms of use: Documents in EconStor may

show abstract

Section: Basic Considerations About Regulation and Investmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Incentive Regulation, Investments and Technological Change

Vogelsang¹

2012

Regulation and the Performance of Communication and Information Networks

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…22 The distinction between "real" and "virtual" operators in a context dealing with NGA deployment is similar to that in Brito et al [2010].…”

Section: Ftth Operatorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In this context, the literature shows that the access regulation can incite firms to deploy their networks at socially optimal dates. Brito et al [2010] take account of the coexistence of an old and a new infrastructure, and the (in)ability of regulators to commit to a policy (i.e. to decide on access rules before operators invest).…”

Section: Related Literature 4 Related Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Access regulation and geographic deployment of a new generation infrastructure

Flacher¹,

Jennequin²

2014

Telecommunications Policy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…This gets reinforced in view of demand uncertainty (Klumpp & Su 2010) and in case that NGANs represent an investment in quality (Vareda, 2010) and a non-drastic innovation (Brito, Pereira & Vareda, 2010). It appears that these features are indeed characteristic to NGA deployment and hence the stricter access is regulated the lower investment incentives will be.…”

Section: Sector-specific Regulation and Service-based Competitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Impact of Regulation and Competition on the Migration from Old to New Communications Infrastructure: Recent Evidence from EU27 Member States

Briglauer¹

2014

SSRN Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Die Dis cus si on Pape rs die nen einer mög lichst schnel len Ver brei tung von neue ren For schungs arbei ten des ZEW. Die Bei trä ge lie gen in allei ni ger Ver ant wor tung der Auto ren und stel len nicht not wen di ger wei se die Mei nung des ZEW dar.Dis cus si on Papers are inten ded to make results of ZEW research prompt ly avai la ble to other eco no mists in order to encou ra ge dis cus si on and sug gesti ons for revi si ons. The aut hors are sole ly respon si ble for the con tents which do not neces sa ri ly repre sent the opi ni on of the ZEW. [vi] AbstractFibre-deployment of next-generation communications networks is currently a major challenge for investing firms as well as for national regulators and is also subject to hot debates at EU level. This work examines the role of regulatory policies and competition controlling for relevant supply and demand side factors. Our econometric model employs dynamic panel data methods that take into account potential endogeneity due to omitted heterogeneity, reverse causality and the dynamic investment specification.Our results indicate that relevant forms of previous broadband access regulations have had a negative impact on investment in new infrastructure. Furthermore, infrastructure-based competition from mobile operators and the replacement effect stemming from the incumbents' existing infrastructure exert a negative impact on ex ante investment incentives. As regards the dynamics of the adjustment process, we find that there are both short-term and long-term effects towards the desired infrastructure level.[1]

show abstract

Can two-part tariffs promote efficient investment on next generation networks?

Cited by 54 publications

References 26 publications

Incentive Regulation, Investments and Technological Change

Incentive Regulation, Investments and Technological Change

Access regulation and geographic deployment of a new generation infrastructure

The Impact of Regulation and Competition on the Migration from Old to New Communications Infrastructure: Recent Evidence from EU27 Member States

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About