2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.cogdev.2010.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can unpredicted outcomes be intended? The role of outcome-beliefs in children's judgments of intention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of course, skilled control of action is still far from mature: preschoolers' deliberate actions are more variable, slower, less precise, and less inhibited than adults' (Adolph and Berger, 2006). Toddlers' perception and knowledge of human action is also immature (e.g., Liao and Deák, 2011). Thus, these results provide a benchmark for further research on the neurological resources that serve children's growing action control, and growing understanding of other people's actions.…”
Section: Mu Desynchronization In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Of course, skilled control of action is still far from mature: preschoolers' deliberate actions are more variable, slower, less precise, and less inhibited than adults' (Adolph and Berger, 2006). Toddlers' perception and knowledge of human action is also immature (e.g., Liao and Deák, 2011). Thus, these results provide a benchmark for further research on the neurological resources that serve children's growing action control, and growing understanding of other people's actions.…”
Section: Mu Desynchronization In Childrenmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Whereas this study and others (Carpenter et al, 2002; Huang, 2013) suggest that understanding of prior intentions might be present in 2- to 3-year-olds in social learning situations, children cannot answer explicit verbal questions about prior intentions until 5–6 years of age (Astington, 1991). Similarly, while there is evidence that 14- to 18-month-old infants preferentially imitate intentional over accidental actions (Carpenter et al, 1998), 4-year-olds have difficulty judging intentions when actions produce unintended (by accident) but desirable outcomes (Liao et al, 2011). Therefore, we must be cautious about extending the superior performance by children without ASD in the Prior Intention condition to a full-fledged concept of intention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that an understanding of mental states better enables children to consider the intentions of the story character, therefore allowing them to make more mature moral judgements (e.g., Killen, Mulvey, Richardson, Jampol & Woodward, 2011;Fu, Killen, Xiao & Lee, 2014). Research has demonstrated that by approximately 5 years of age children have begun to consider intentions more than outcomes when making moral judgements (e.g., Liao, Li & Deak, 2011;Zelazo et al, 1996;Helwig, et al, 2001), and that their Theory of Mind (ToM) skills contribute to such considerations (Killen et al, 2011). However, with the one exception, the research reported thus far employs the practice of comparing characters across scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%