2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jocs.2015.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can vacuum morphologies predict solubility and intrinsic dissolution rate? A case study with felodipine polymorph form IV

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most prominent facets of the crystal are those that are the slowest growing, while the smallest facets are the fastest growing and may absent in the nal product. 52,53 The BFDH calculations for a single crystal of LiNbO 3 indicated the presence of {012} and {104} as major facets, which agreed with the FFT analyses of the HRTEM results. The HRTEM results and the BFDH calculations suggested the formation of single-crystalline nanoparticles of LiNbO 3 .…”
Section: Morphology and Structural Characterization Of The Linbo 3 Nasupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The most prominent facets of the crystal are those that are the slowest growing, while the smallest facets are the fastest growing and may absent in the nal product. 52,53 The BFDH calculations for a single crystal of LiNbO 3 indicated the presence of {012} and {104} as major facets, which agreed with the FFT analyses of the HRTEM results. The HRTEM results and the BFDH calculations suggested the formation of single-crystalline nanoparticles of LiNbO 3 .…”
Section: Morphology and Structural Characterization Of The Linbo 3 Nasupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Vacuum morphology of Form I and II was generated by the BFDH model. The benefit of this method was to identify important faces in the growth process [44]. Results show that (0-20), (001), (0-11), and (100) are among the major surfaces, with (0-20) being the most dominant face.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crystal surface differences would cause diverse dissolution behavior. , By comparing the chemical groups on the surfaces of different crystal faces, it was not difficult to find out that S1 (0 1 0), S1 (0 1 −1), S3 (0 1 1), and S3 (0 1 −1), all of which were surfaces with exposed oxalic acid chains, had bigger interaction energy with water when compared with the other surfaces (Figures S15–S19). In fact, the oxalic acid chains were the support for the crystal structure of all NIC crystals.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%