2016
DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2016031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can venous base excess replace arterial base excess as a marker of early shock and a predictor of survival in trauma?

Abstract: INTRODUCTIONArterial base excess is an established marker of shock and predictor of survival in trauma patients.However, venous blood is more quickly and easily obtained. This study aimed to determine if venous base excess could replace arterial base excess as a marker in trauma patients at presentation and if venous base excess is predictive of survival at 24 hours and one week. METHODSThis was a prospective study of 394 trauma patients presenting to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital over a 17-m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 22 ) have shown satisfactory agreement between resting arterial and venous blood pH, PCO 2 and Base Excess, especially for subjects who are not in shock, as in this study. This agreement is confirmed in another study that included trauma patients 23 , but has not been demonstrated with mechanically ventilated patients 24 . As the PO 2 is expected to diverge significantly in arterial and venous samples, this variable was not included in this study and was replaced by arterial O 2 saturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“… 22 ) have shown satisfactory agreement between resting arterial and venous blood pH, PCO 2 and Base Excess, especially for subjects who are not in shock, as in this study. This agreement is confirmed in another study that included trauma patients 23 , but has not been demonstrated with mechanically ventilated patients 24 . As the PO 2 is expected to diverge significantly in arterial and venous samples, this variable was not included in this study and was replaced by arterial O 2 saturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Patients with a base deficit C3 meq/L at admission had an 11-time greater risk at dying compared to patients with a base deficit of \3 meq/L. A base deficit provides a fast estimate of the physiological disturbance of the patient, is a marker for shock and is usually part of the standard diagnostic armamentarium in the emergency department [31,32]. Base deficits are already used to predict complications and mortality in trauma and intensive care patients and has been described by Elliot et al to also predict mortality in NSTI patients [31][32][33][34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A base deficit provides a fast estimate of the physiological disturbance of the patient, is a marker for shock and is usually part of the standard diagnostic armamentarium in the emergency department [31,32]. Base deficits are already used to predict complications and mortality in trauma and intensive care patients and has been described by Elliot et al to also predict mortality in NSTI patients [31][32][33][34]. It has been suggested that the LRINEC score might also be predictive for mortality, since this score also looks at markers for sepsis severity in NSTI patients; however, in this study the LRINEC score was not predictive for mortality and was in most patients far below the cutoff point for NSTI suspicion [13,35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is not possible to measure this parameter in all trauma centers. On the other hand, BE of the blood is an index of shock and physiological impairment in trauma patients and is associated with blood lactate concentration and the severity of the injury [ 16 , 17 ]. Factors that affect the base deficit include the use of bicarbonate, hypothermia, hypocapnia, heparin, ethanol and ketoacidosis [ 18 , 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%