2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can visual information encoded in cortical columns be decoded from magnetoencephalography data in humans?

Abstract: It is a principal open question whether noninvasive imaging methods in humans candecode information encoded at a spatial scale as fine as the basic functional unit of cortex: cortical columns. We addressed this question in five magnetoencephalography

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

11
105
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(117 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
(154 reference statements)
11
105
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1), with a sufficiently large number of trials for each face identity (104-112 trials per face identity, 9,464-10,192 trials per participant) to be able to evaluate the representation of individual face identities in each participant (26). We used MEG because it has excellent temporal resolution and sufficient spatial resolution for decoding of fine visual information from spatial patterns of neural activity (26,27). In each participant, we used an independent functional localizer task in MEG to identify face-selective regions in right lateral occipital cortex and right fusiform gyrus.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), with a sufficiently large number of trials for each face identity (104-112 trials per face identity, 9,464-10,192 trials per participant) to be able to evaluate the representation of individual face identities in each participant (26). We used MEG because it has excellent temporal resolution and sufficient spatial resolution for decoding of fine visual information from spatial patterns of neural activity (26,27). In each participant, we used an independent functional localizer task in MEG to identify face-selective regions in right lateral occipital cortex and right fusiform gyrus.…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the intermediate position of spatial layout perception in the visual processing hierarchy between image-specific processing of individual scenes and navigation-related processing, we hypothesized that a signal for spatial layout processing would emerge after signals related to low-level visual processing in early visual regions (~100 ms, (Schmolesky et al, 1998;Cichy et al, 2015a)), and before activity observed typically in navigationrelated regions such as the hippocampus (~400 ms (Mormann et al, 2008)). Further, to be considered as an independent step in visual scene processing, spatial layout must be processed tolerant to changes in low-level features, including typical variations in viewing conditions, and to changes in high-level features such as scene category.…”
Section: The Temporal Dynamics Of Spatial Layout Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MEG can resolve the timecourse of fast processes with a resolution in the order of milliseconds, while source localization and information‐based mapping through multivariate techniques can effectively increase its spatial resolution (Cichy et al, 2015; Kriegeskorte, Goebel, & Bandettini, 2006). MVPA offers increased sensitivity through its ability to extract information from responses at multiple locations in space and time, and it can thus resolve differences in overlapping patterns that averaging‐based statistical analyses fail to detect (Norman, Polyn, Detre, & Haxby, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%