2004
DOI: 10.2337/diacare.27.5.1182
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can We Apply the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel Definition of the Metabolic Syndrome to Asians?

Abstract: E.-SHYONG TAI, MRCP 1 OBJECTIVE -Limited information is available about the metabolic syndrome in Asians. Furthermore, the definition of central obesity using waist circumference may not be appropriate for Asians. The objectives of this study were to determine the optimal waist circumference for diagnosing central obesity in Asians and to estimate the prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in an Asian population.RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS -We used data from the 1998 Singapore National Health Survey, a cross-sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
504
9
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 736 publications
(541 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
19
504
9
9
Order By: Relevance
“…38,39 The implications of these are that there is need for standardization of assays used for the estimation of adiponectin. Furthermore, as the expression of the metabolic syndrome may be dependent on several factors that are linked to ethnicity, 40,41 it would also be necessary to establish the adiponectin cutoff level for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome for different populations. Variability in measured adiponectin should not be construed as a disadvantage because other criteria for diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…38,39 The implications of these are that there is need for standardization of assays used for the estimation of adiponectin. Furthermore, as the expression of the metabolic syndrome may be dependent on several factors that are linked to ethnicity, 40,41 it would also be necessary to establish the adiponectin cutoff level for the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome for different populations. Variability in measured adiponectin should not be construed as a disadvantage because other criteria for diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome (e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…WC, HDL-C, TG) have the same analytical limitations and also show wide variations in different populations. [41][42][43] In summary, Type 2 diabetes mellitus represents an ideal paradigm for the study of the interplay between obesity and the multiple factors that confer increased risk of developing the metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease. In view of the current controversy on the precise definition, criteria for diagnosis and pathophysiology of the metabolic syndrome, 3,43,44 some physicians may have problems with including another criterion for the definition of the metabolic syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the criteria used, the prevalence of metabolic syndrome in the United States and Europe is around 20-30% in adults, [1][2][3] while in Asia, the prevalence is about 10-20%. [3][4][5] Recently, Hwang et al also present the prevalence of metabolic syndrome is 20% in men and 15.3% in women among Taiwanese adults. Metabolic syndrome has been shown to associate with increased risk for all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality, and also increase the risk for cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes in later life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, the inappropriateness of the recommended cutoff value of WC for diagnosis of CVD risk in Asian population, owing to their smaller build, was noted. In a study to determine the appropriate cutoff value of WC for metabolic syndrome among Asian population, Tan et al (2004) had found that cutoff value of WC higher than 90 cm among male is more appropriate for the said purpose than the conventional 94 cm cutoff value for WC. In present article, therefore, the cut-off value of 490 cm WC has been considered as one of the CVD risk condition (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cutoff value 426.6 cm (obtained from ROC curve analysis) for UAC has been used for diagnosis of CVD risk condition. Again the cutoff value of 490 cm (Tan et al, 2004) for WC has been used for the same …”
Section: Validity Of the Upper Arm Circumferencementioning
confidence: 99%