2020
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staa553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we detect the stellar differential rotation of WASP-7 through the Rossiter–McLaughlin observations?

Abstract: The Rossiter-McLaughlin (RM) effect is the radial velocity signal generated when an object transits a rotating star. Stars rotate differentially and this affects the shape and amplitude of this signal, on a level that can no longer be ignored with precise spectrographs. Highly misaligned planets provide a unique opportunity to probe stellar differential rotation via the RM effect, as they cross several stellar latitudes. In this sense, WASP-7, and its hot Jupiter with a projected misalignment of ∼ 90 • , is on… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We found α = 0.06 ± 0.03, compatible with the value α = 0.08 +0.11 −0.13 obtained by with the study of the reloaded RM effect, thus excluding high differential rotation rates. We note that differential rotation can contribute to the RM shape (e.g., Serrano et al 2020), in particular for polar orbit planets like WASP-121b. However, given its low rate for WASP-121, it is unlikely that it plays a major role in this context, but it could explain some of the RV fit residuals (Sect.…”
Section: Fourier Transform Of the Ccfmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…We found α = 0.06 ± 0.03, compatible with the value α = 0.08 +0.11 −0.13 obtained by with the study of the reloaded RM effect, thus excluding high differential rotation rates. We note that differential rotation can contribute to the RM shape (e.g., Serrano et al 2020), in particular for polar orbit planets like WASP-121b. However, given its low rate for WASP-121, it is unlikely that it plays a major role in this context, but it could explain some of the RV fit residuals (Sect.…”
Section: Fourier Transform Of the Ccfmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…On the other hand, solarlike differential rotation can become important in main sequence stars (Karoff et al 2018) and it is expected to be stronger in F-G stars (Balona & Abedigamba 2016). In our calculations, we assume solid-body rotation, meaning that we are not considering the amplitude variation of the RM signal that could be introduced by this effect (Serrano et al 2020).…”
Section: Accuracy Of the Modelled Transit Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overestimation of vsin(i) could have variety of reasons. For instance, the RM signal can be affected by second-order effects such as the convective blueshift and granulation (Shporer & Brown 2011;Cegla et al 2016b), stellar differential rotation (Hirano et al 2011;Hirano 2014;Albrecht et al 2012;Cegla et al 2016b;Serrano et al 2020), microlensing effect due to the transiting planet's mass (Oshagh et al 2013), impact of ringed exoplanet on RM signal (Akinsanmi et al 2018;de Mooij et al 2017), occulted stellar active regions (Oshagh et al 2016(Oshagh et al , 2018, nonocculted stellar active regions (Boldt et al 2020), and also inaccurate estimations of stellar limb darkening (Csizmadia et al 2013;Yan et al 2015). Some of these effects will have minor impact on the RM shape and amplitude (such as microlensing and ring around the planet), however, some like the stellar active region occulation and stellar differential rotation could cause significant deformation of the RM shape and also alter its amplitude.…”
Section: Modeling Rm With Additional Gaussian Processmentioning
confidence: 99%