Can we explain why some people do and some people do not act on their intentions?

Abstract

Behavioural theorists have identified attitudes, perceived norms and self-efficacy as the important determinants of people's intentions to engage in a given behaviour. Because intentions predict behaviour, these same variables also account for a considerable amount of the variation in behaviour. Nevertheless, there is often a substantial proportion of the population who do not act on their intentions. While a recently proposed integrative theory of behaviour suggests that these 'failures' are due either to a lack of skills and/or to the presence of environmental constraints, it has also been argued that the determinants of intention may have a direct, as well as in indirect, effect on behaviour. This paper uses data from a longitudinal study (Project RESPECT) to explore the extent to which attitudes, perceived norms and self-efficacy explain why some people do and others do not act on their intentions to engage in a health protective behaviour. Although the data provide further evidence that these three variables account for a significant proportion of the variance in intentions (and behaviour), they perform poorly when predicting behaviour for persons with pre-existing high intentions. It may be reasonable to ask whether a 'new' theory is needed to explain why some people do, and some people do not, act on their intentions.

Evaluating the Risk and Attractiveness of Romantic Partners When Confronted with Contradictory Cues

“…While one could argue that this is merely a socially desirable response, it seems more likely that young adults have learned the public health message. The important question, which cannot be answered by our present study, is whether they successfully act on those intentions (Fishbein et al, 2003). Although self-reports of condom-use intentions may be inaccurate (DeVisser & Smith, 2004), meta-analyses of condom use studies and intervention research show moderate to large correlations between condom use intentions and behavior (Albarracín et al, 2001;Sheeran et al, 1999).…”

Multilevel factors are associated with immunosuppressant nonadherence in heart transplant recipients: The international BRIGHT study

“…Given theoretical models’ common treatment of barriers as proximal determinants of health behavior,38 and the findings of other transplant studies,17, 18 this is no surprise. Assessment of barriers can guide tailored interventions 43.…”

“…Its main strengths are its large geographical coverage (11 countries) as well as its use of theory to select potential multilevel correlates 6, 19, 20, 38…”

Siblings of adults with schizophrenia: Expectations about future caregiving roles.

“…In this study, we asked siblings about their caregiving expectations or intentions with respect to a broad range of instrumental tasks and emotionally supportive activities. We focused on behavioral expectations or intentions toward future involvement because intentions, although not the sole determinant of behavior, are better predictors of behaviors than attitudes (Fishbein, Hennessy, Yzer, & Douglas, 2003). Second, we gathered data on a much richer array of factors that may influence the extent to which siblings expect to provide instrumental and emotional support to their brother or sister with mental illness when their parents are no longer able to assume a caregiving role.…”