2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we identify women at risk of pregnancy despite using emergency contraception? Data from randomized trials of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
143
1
7

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 273 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
143
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…135,136 In addition, on the basis of recent data about lower efficacy of levonorgestrel EC, ulipristal may be more effective in people who weigh more than 165 pounds. 137,138 Placement of a copper-bearing IUD is less commonly used for EC in adolescents but is the most effective EC method, with a failure rate of less than 1%. 139 The recommended dosage of levonorgestrel is a single 1.5-mg dose.…”
Section: Emergency Contraceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…135,136 In addition, on the basis of recent data about lower efficacy of levonorgestrel EC, ulipristal may be more effective in people who weigh more than 165 pounds. 137,138 Placement of a copper-bearing IUD is less commonly used for EC in adolescents but is the most effective EC method, with a failure rate of less than 1%. 139 The recommended dosage of levonorgestrel is a single 1.5-mg dose.…”
Section: Emergency Contraceptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data suggest that ulipristal acetate, approved by the FDA in 2010, may have increased effectiveness over oral levonorgestrel at the end of the 5-day window of use and in heavier women. [208][209][210] On the basis of data demonstrating that the levonorgestrel EC pill loses effectiveness in women who weigh more than 165 pounds and is ineffective in women who weigh more than 176 pounds, the levonorgestrel EC pill is undergoing revised labeling in Europe, and the FDA is considering whether to require similar revisions in the United States. 211 Unlike ulipristal, which is pregnancy category X, levonorgestrel does not have teratogenic or other adverse effects on the fetus, 212 and a pregnancy test is not necessary before prescribing levonorgestrel EC.…”
Section: Male Condomsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As of 2016, three brands of progestin-only EC were available: Plan B ® (the most widely used and well known) and two generic brands (NextChoice ® and Option 2 ® ). In response to recent studies suggesting that progestin-only EC may be less or not at all effective when used by heavier women (Glasier et al 2011;Kapp et al 2015;Gemzell-Danielsson et al 2015), in 2014, Health Canada issued a warning stating that progestin-only EC may be less effective in women weighing 165 pounds or more and ineffective in women weighing over 176 pounds (Eggertson 2014). Health Canada subsequently requested that the labels for all progestin-only EC products in Canada incorporate this warning (Health Canada 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%