2008
DOI: 10.1080/14647270801953109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we improve recruitment of oocyte donors with loss of donor anonymity? A hospital-based survey

Abstract: Loss of donor anonymity reduced by half those willing to consider donation in all age groups. The future of this service depends on recruitment of donors willing to be identified. Consideration of older donors may be an option if adequate counselling occurs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the UK for instance, the Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the body that regulates the practice of assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom, passed a law in 2005 that makes it mandatory for donors to disclose their identity. Following the passage of this law, 17% of non-patient women surveyed considered donating an oocyte as opposed to nearly 34% who demonstrated a positive attitude prior to the removal of anonymity in the same group [16,33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the UK for instance, the Human Fertility and Embryology Authority (HFEA), the body that regulates the practice of assisted reproduction in the United Kingdom, passed a law in 2005 that makes it mandatory for donors to disclose their identity. Following the passage of this law, 17% of non-patient women surveyed considered donating an oocyte as opposed to nearly 34% who demonstrated a positive attitude prior to the removal of anonymity in the same group [16,33,34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While it is known that patients will have a significantly reduced likelihood of having cryopreserved embryos if donor oocytes are split among multiple recipients (Mullin et al 2010), oocyte sharing may also be unattractive to fertility patients for other reasons (Blyth 2004). Another development further curtailing Irish access to an already limited fertility treatment resource has been the recent discontinuation of IVF with anonymous donor oocytes in the UK (Fortescue 2003;Brett et al 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ainsi au Pays-Bas, Janssens et al [21] ont observé durant le dé bat sur la levé e de l'anonymat qui a pré cé dé la nouvelle loi de 2004 que le nombre de donneurs avait diminué de 70 % et que la moitié des banques de sperme avait fermé . En Grande-Bretagne où la loi sur la levé e de l'anonymat est applicable depuis 2005, de nombreux auteurs [22] ont signalé une diminution de moitié du nombre de donneurs. Le 25 juin 2009, la Socié té royale de mé decine a organisé à Londres un congrè s sur le recrutement des donneurs de sperme ; face à la pé nurie des donneurs de sperme, on a pu entendre Lisa Jardine, pré sidente de la HFEA, disposé e à reconsidé rer la notion de gratuité , pendant que le Docteur E. Harris demandait le retour de l'anonymat du don.…”
Section: Conse´quences De La Leve´e De L'anonymatunclassified