Can we manage groundwater? A method to determine the quantitative testability of groundwater management plans

Abstract

Groundwater is the world's largest freshwater resource and due to overextraction, levels have declined in many regions causing extensive social and environmental impacts. Groundwater management seeks to balance and mitigate the detrimental impacts of development, with plans commonly used to outline management pathways. Thus, plan efficiency is crucial, but seldom are plans systematically and quantitatively assessed for effectiveness. This study frames groundwater management as a system control problem in order to develop a novel testability assessment rubric to determine if plans meet the requirements of a control loop, and subsequently, whether they can be quantitatively tested. Seven components of a management plan equivalent to basic components of a control loop were determined, and requirements of each component necessary to enable testability were defined. Each component was weighted based upon proposed relative importance, then segmented into rated categories depending on the degree the requirements were met. Component importance varied but, a defined objective or acceptable impact was necessary for plans to be testable. The rubric was developed within the context of the Australian groundwater management industry, and while use of the rubric is not limited to Australia, it was applied to 15 Australian groundwater management plans and approximately 47% were found to be testable. Considering the importance of effective groundwater management, and the central role of plans, our lack of ability to test many plans is concerning.

Rapid and Accurate Estimates of Streamflow Depletion Caused by Groundwater Pumping Using Analytical Depletion Functions

“…However, quantifying streamflow depletion is challenging due to the complexity of modeling groundwater‐surface water interactions (Barlow & Leake, ). To guide sustainable water management, it is critical to develop approaches to estimate streamflow depletion that can allow local water managers to make informed decisions on groundwater withdrawals in a variety of settings (White et al, ).…”

A Novel Caving Model of Overburden Strata Movement Induced by Coal Mining

“…Exploitation activities inevitably cause ground subsidence, water loss, building damage, and a series of other problems, especially in some eco-environmental fragile areas [3,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. China, one of the energy giants, uses coal as its main source of energy, with coal production and consumption accounting for approximately 77% and 65% of the total national energy consumption, respectively [8,[36][37][38][39][40][41]. Among the 96 state-owned key coal mines, 71% are in water-shortage mining areas.…”

The Present State and Future Application of Cloud Computing for Numerical Groundwater Modeling

“…While the techniques of data worth analysis are being refined to become more computationally efficient, parallelization through cloud computing may make them more feasible. Agent‐based modeling (Castilla ) and quantitative groundwater management testing (White et al ) explicitly include decisions and actions of stakeholders. Modeling decisions and actions introduces an additional level of complexity relative to purely physical groundwater modeling.…”