2018
DOI: 10.1002/ams2.330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can we predict delayed undesirable events after blunt injury to the torso visceral organs?

Abstract: AimBlunt injuries to visceral organs have the potential to lead to delayed pseudoaneurysm formation or organ rupture, but current trauma and surgical guidelines do not recommend repetitive imaging. This study examined the incidence and timing of delayed undesirable events and established advisable timing for follow‐up imaging and appropriate observational admission.MethodsPatients with blunt splenic (S), liver (L), or kidney (K) injury treated with non‐operative management (NOM) in our institution were include… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This previous study suggested that follow-up enhanced CT performed approximately 1 week after injury may be useful to detect delayed SPA formation. Another retrospective observation study of adult patients with blunt injury to the torso visceral organs from Japan showed that the undesirable delayed events were recognized on follow-up CT scans in 11.4% of NOM patients at 6-7 days after hospitalization [21]. This previous study suggested that the second follow-up CT scan that was performed 1-2 days after admission did not help predict undesirable results of delayed events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This previous study suggested that follow-up enhanced CT performed approximately 1 week after injury may be useful to detect delayed SPA formation. Another retrospective observation study of adult patients with blunt injury to the torso visceral organs from Japan showed that the undesirable delayed events were recognized on follow-up CT scans in 11.4% of NOM patients at 6-7 days after hospitalization [21]. This previous study suggested that the second follow-up CT scan that was performed 1-2 days after admission did not help predict undesirable results of delayed events.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…15,16 Other series advocate for using patient status in prompting repeat imaging, as all patients with reported delayed complications demonstrated a clinical change. 18,19 In fact, in a survey of members of the Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST), only 14.5% of respondents stated they would routinely obtain follow-up CT scans in all patients with blunt splenic injury. 12 Our data demonstrated delayed complications, including PSA, were found in 46 of 105 patients (43.8%) who underwent repeat imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2,11,15,16 Given discordant recommendations, and lack of a standard practice, there continues to be variability in the utilization and timing of repeat imaging in adult patients with blunt splenic injury. 2,18,19 The current study aimed to compare repeat imaging based on the reason for scan (CC or NCC) in regard to delayed complications and interventions. Our data demonstrated that nearly half of patients with blunt splenic injuries reimaged based on NCC were found to have a delayed complication, with more than half of this group undergoing intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%