Current asthma guidelines have been directed to compiling information and attempting to standardize care to assist clinicians in the management of asthma. Algorithms were introduced to summarize a step-wise increase and decrease in medications in order to achieve optimal control. Medications are placed in a step-wise approach with a preferred and alternative medication being listed. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are the cornerstone of treatment and the step-care approach utilizes a scheme of increasing ICS dose along with supplementary medications based on available studies.With the last update of the NAEPP EPR-3 guidelines in 2007, 1 emphasis was placed on achieving asthma control, defined within two domains, impairment and risk. Impairment consists of day and night symptoms, rescue medication use, pulmonary function and questionnaires to assess these measures over a short-term period.The term risk brings attention to the assessment of the potential for exacerbations, adverse effects to medications and progression of the disease. The Centers for Disease Control recently reported that we have reduced asthma mortality and we are seeing a reduction in hospitalizations but new goals are being set to further reduce asthma hospitalizations. 2 We have an opportunity to significantly reduce the worldwide burden of asthma in children and impact consequent respiratory outcomes in adults. However, as reviewed in a recent Rostrum published in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 3 this will require a paradigm shift that is directed at altering the natural history of asthma, reducing asthma exacerbations and preventing long-term adverse outcomes of childhood asthma. The essential tools proposed for this proactive approach include (1) assessment of lung function over time (lung trajectories), (2) the Composite Asthma Severity Score (CASI), (3) a panel of useful biomarkers, (4) the Seasonal Asthma Exacerbation Prediction Index (SAEPI), and (5) application of adherence monitoring technology. The goal is to reduce long-term consequences of the physiologic and biologic processes leading to persistent asthma, severe asthma, and COPD.Since the last update of the NAEPP asthma guidelines in 2007, 1 there have been several key NHLBI and NIAID studies that that should be considered in future asthma guidelines updates. It is very important to make the appropriate diagnosis, so that treatment can be started and to provide guidance on treatment choices in mild to moderate asthma severity. However, countries vary in medication regulatory approval and cost considerations. Each reiteration of asthma guidelines must also address the core needs of the health disparate population while also identifying those who are not responding for advanced care treatment strategies.