2016
DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can you hear me now? Range‐testing a submerged passive acoustic receiver array in a Caribbean coral reef habitat

Abstract: Submerged passive acoustic technology allows researchers to investigate spatial and temporal movement patterns of many marine and freshwater species. The technology uses receivers to detect and record acoustic transmissions emitted from tags attached to an individual. Acoustic signal strength naturally attenuates over distance, but numerous environmental variables also affect the probability a tag is detected. Knowledge of receiver range is crucial for designing acoustic arrays and analyzing telemetry data. He… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
74
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(93 reference statements)
2
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, in this study, we work with an approximate receiver detection range of 250 m (radius), suggesting that a co-occurrence can be recorded between individuals up to approximately 500 m apart. We noted earlier that the effective detection range can be highly variable and is not always fully accounted for in many studies [29,50], suggesting further refinement of network weightings is needed as these methods develop. The current methodology proposed in this paper remains unvalidated and fine-scale, contact network data, such as that obtained from proximity loggers, are much needed to confirm the accuracy with which these techniques truly capture social associations in marine organisms [2,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in this study, we work with an approximate receiver detection range of 250 m (radius), suggesting that a co-occurrence can be recorded between individuals up to approximately 500 m apart. We noted earlier that the effective detection range can be highly variable and is not always fully accounted for in many studies [29,50], suggesting further refinement of network weightings is needed as these methods develop. The current methodology proposed in this paper remains unvalidated and fine-scale, contact network data, such as that obtained from proximity loggers, are much needed to confirm the accuracy with which these techniques truly capture social associations in marine organisms [2,51].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, extensive range tests should be performed. The results of such range tests can be used to improve the setup and the design of the receiver arrays and/or to adapt the questions that can be answered (Hobday & Pincock, 2011;Kessel et al, 2014;Stocks et al, 2014;Hayden et al, 2016;Selby et al, 2016;Steckenreuter et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This framework has two direct applications. First, it can lead to improved inferences about source locations (“localization”) which is important in many applications, especially acoustic telemetry (Selby et al., ) and density estimation (Efford et al., ). Second, it allows investigators to better understand how bioacoustic methods work under field conditions in heterogeneous environments by enabling in situ inference about factors that influence attenuation from field data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Selby et al. () model attenuation as a function of source and sensor specific covariates (e.g. depth).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%