“Can you recommend a&amp;nbsp;journal for my paper?”

Cate, Olle ten

doi:10.1007/s40037-022-00712-0

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In 2022, Olle ten Cate, a senior medical education scholar, published a commentary in which he answered the frequently asked question, “Can you recommend a journal for my paper?,” 16 suggesting that medical educators are interested in further guidance on this important topic. ten Cate’s response draws on personal experience and a recent study that surveyed medical educators about journal choice 17 .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

“The best home for this paper”: A qualitative study of how authors select where to submit manuscripts

Maggio,

Chtena,

Alperin

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Introduction: For academics selecting a target journal to submit a manuscript is a critical decision with career implications. In medical education, research conducted in 2016 found that authors were influenced by multiple factors such as a journal's prestige and its mission. However, since this research was conducted the publishing landscape has shifted to include a broader variety of journals, an increased threat of predatory journals, and new publishing models. This study updates and expands upon how medical education authors decide which journal to submit to with the aim of describing the motivational factors and journal characteristics that guide authors' decision making. Methods: The authors conducted five qualitative focus groups in which twenty-two medical education authors and editors participated. During the focus groups participants were engaged in a discussion about how they select a journal to submit their manuscripts. Audio from all focus groups was transcribed. Transcripts were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis. Results: Participants considered multiple factors when selecting a target journal. Factors included a journal's impact, the scope of a journal, journal quality, and technical factors (e.g., word limits). Participants also described how social factors influenced their process and that open access plays a role that could both encourage or deter submission. Discussion: The findings describe the motivational factors and influential signals that guide authors in their journal selection decision making. These findings confirm, extend, and update journal selection factors reported in medical education and other disciplines. Notably, these findings emphasize the role of social factors, relationships and personal experiences, which were absent from previous work. Additionally, we observed increased consideration of OA and a shift away from an emphasis on journal prestige.

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%