2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-8171.2006.00010.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canaanite Religion

Abstract: Canaanite religion" is a controversial term because the Bible and some religious scholars distinguish between Canaanite and Israelite religions. However, biblical and archaeological data suggest that Israelite religion was one local variety of the larger, regional Canaanite religion. Canaanite religion is the religion of all peoples living on the eastern Mediterranean seaboard prior to the Common Era. The gods and the myths in this region display some stable characteristics, yet evolved new details and changin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More likely is that it developed from the standard polytheism of Bronze and Iron Age Palestine (see recent Discussion in Smith 1990, 2001; cf. Noll 2007). Evidence for the polytheistic, Canaanite heritage of Israel's faith appears in numerous biblical texts.…”
Section: Elements In the Discussion: A Survey Of Recent Developmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More likely is that it developed from the standard polytheism of Bronze and Iron Age Palestine (see recent Discussion in Smith 1990, 2001; cf. Noll 2007). Evidence for the polytheistic, Canaanite heritage of Israel's faith appears in numerous biblical texts.…”
Section: Elements In the Discussion: A Survey Of Recent Developmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is clear to see how the idea of the Levant as an Axial region developed. During the Axial period, Judaic ideology in the region seems to have emphasized many of the traits associated with axiality, including an explicit moral stance, a clear stress on the omniscience and omnipresence of the chief deity, reinforcement of prosociality, and claims about the equality of all people under the eyes of god (Finer 1999, Noll 2007. Further, Persian and Babylonian influence in the region during the Axial Age helped spread Zoroastrian ideals to the Levant (and into Anatolia and Greece, for that matter), which also carried many elements of a universalizing and moralizing ethic, including the idea that rulers were not gods, which was indeed a change from earlier periods (notably under Egyptian control of the region).…”
Section: Israel-palestinementioning
confidence: 99%
“… Israel and Judah. As shown by Noll (2007), the term ‘Israel’ is difficult to define. Here the terms Israel and Judah are used as referring to both the regions and the historical kingdoms/states in the north and the south (there never was any historical, unified Israel!)…”
Section: Preliminary Remarksmentioning
confidence: 99%