This article considers how the scholarly history published in the pages of the Canadian Historical Review has spoken to and been shaped by broad structural changes of two kinds: those that determine scholarly practices of knowledge-making, and those that determine the meaning of nationality. Beginning with a sketch of these themes in the journal’s first seventy-five years, the article then discusses specific examples of topics related to these themes in the journal since the mid-1990s. The author emphasizes public history, reflexive scholarship, and three different ways of engaging with nationality: rejection of methodological nationalism, justifications for “nation” as a category of analysis, and contributions to the new imperial history. Emphasizing the impact of communications and transportation technologies throughout, the essay concludes with reflections on how digitization and Web 2.0 technologies are changing scholarly historians’ relations to their audiences. Sketching the opportunities and risks of our current moment of change, the author concludes that the Canadian Historical Review will adapt.