2008
DOI: 10.1139/x07-224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canadian national biomass equations: new parameter estimates that include British Columbia data

Abstract: National allometric equations covering the most common tree species of Canada’s forests were produced based on tree mass data acquired in the early 1980s during the ENergy from the FORest (ENFOR) program. The equations allow us to calculate the mass estimate of four tree components (foliage, branches, stem bark, and stem wood) using either diameter at breast height or a combination of diameter at breast height and height. Missing from that data set, however, were the data from British Columbia. A usable Britis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
125
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We could have compared estimates generated using reconstructed DBH only with estimates generated using DBH and HT, as alternative models that could have been applied do exist [36,37]. However, this analysis would have been a model inter-comparison exercise that compares the relative difference between estimates of biomass increment using DBH and HT relative to the use of DBH only, not an accuracy assessment directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We could have compared estimates generated using reconstructed DBH only with estimates generated using DBH and HT, as alternative models that could have been applied do exist [36,37]. However, this analysis would have been a model inter-comparison exercise that compares the relative difference between estimates of biomass increment using DBH and HT relative to the use of DBH only, not an accuracy assessment directly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Between 1% to 5% of the samples were affected by some form of management and these observations were excluded from the samples. The biomass of bark, branches, foliage, and stemwood was calculated from dimension analysis based on diameter and height [41,42]. Total aboveground biomass was then calculated from Interior Douglas-fir was differentiated from the coastal variety by only including trees east of the Cascade/Coastal Mountain range.…”
Section: Forest Inventory Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas many comparable models predict the annual increments of diameter and height before deriving the growth rate of stemwood volume or biomass, Sawtooth assumes aboveground biomass growth as the dependent variable [30]. For this study, estimates of aboveground biomass growth were derived from dimension analysis of the tree diameter and height using Canada's national biomass equations [42] and a dry weight-to-carbon ratio of 0.5 [43]. The Default 1 equation predicted the natural logarithm of the aboveground biomass growth of the k th tree as:…”
Section: Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering that many more stem taper data have become available since then, a research project has been undertaken to compile stem taper data across Canada and produce taper models for the whole country and for most tree species. As in the Canadian national biomass equations (Lambert et al 2005, Ung et al 2008, the application context of these taper models is the national forest inventory, meaning that they rely on DBH with or without tree height for a given species. The objective is to present the resulting models after describing the available data and the adopted method.…”
Section: Résumémentioning
confidence: 99%