2015
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1054569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canadian News Media Coverage of Climate Change: Historical Trajectories, Dominant Frames, and International Comparisons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
6
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Analyses of frames that dominate our broader data set appear elsewhere (Stoddart and Tindall ; Stoddart et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Analyses of frames that dominate our broader data set appear elsewhere (Stoddart and Tindall ; Stoddart et al. ).…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An analysis of the broader period 1997 to 2010 appears in Stoddart, Haluza-DeLay, and Tindall (2016). is structured to code for agreement or disagreement with issue statements, which focuses the analysis on how actors cluster around shared support or opposition to a discourse.…”
Section: Methodsologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The United Kingdom passed a "world-leading" climate and emissions reductions bill despite controversy (Giddens 2009). In Canada, one major paper largely accepted the consensus science position, while another provided more space for climate skepticism (Stoddart, Haluza-DeLay, and Tindall 2016). These contradictory tendencies soften the rejection of science evident in the Anglo cluster, making the United States exceptional in its degree of rejection.…”
Section: Four Contrasts In Climate Change Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asplund (2014) identifies five macro-themes in the literature on public perceptions of climate change, such as consensus and conflict in climate science (e.g. Asplund et al, 2013;Feldman, 2013;Jaspal et al, 2016;Schäfer, 2016;Schmidt et al, 2013;Speck, 2010), attribution of causes, levels of concern, climate change frames as filtered through existing worldviews (Leiserowitz et al, 2013;Poortinga et al, 2011;Whitmarsh, 2011), and the influence of experience on interpreting climate change (Akerlof et al, 2013;Spence et al, 2010;Taylor et al, 2014;Weber, 2010). In support to this, the literature review (from 1980 to 2014) on the evolution of public perceptions of climate change carried out by Capstick et al (2015) shows that changes in public perception were particularly influenced by experiences of extreme weather events, media events, economic downturn and political events.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%