2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2012.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canal and Isthmus Debridement Efficacy Using a Sonic Irrigation Technique in a Closed-canal System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13 Sonic devices, such as Vibringe, are intended to increase the efficacy of irrigant delivery and improve canal cleanliness. Johnson et al 25 concluded that sonic irrigation devices have significantly better debridement efficacy than instrumented canal irrigation with conventional side-vented needles. The results of the present study indicate that TAP decreases the push-out bond strength of MTA to dentin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 Sonic devices, such as Vibringe, are intended to increase the efficacy of irrigant delivery and improve canal cleanliness. Johnson et al 25 concluded that sonic irrigation devices have significantly better debridement efficacy than instrumented canal irrigation with conventional side-vented needles. The results of the present study indicate that TAP decreases the push-out bond strength of MTA to dentin.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 However, instrumentation remains one of the most difficult tasks in endodontic therapy. 2 Several techniques and instruments have been used to improve root canal preparation. Nickel-Titanium (NiTi) has become a standard and has improved cleaning and shaping of the root canal system, although it has encountered some limitations due to the complex anatomy of the root canal system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, it was concluded that the Vibringe system removed more debris than CSI from simulated root canal irregularities (14). However, Johnson et al (15) stated that Vibringe was not superior to CSI when comparing debridement efficacies. Similarly, the present study showed no significant differences between Vibringe and CSI for CH removal in all segments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Unlike other sonic devices, this system provides sonic activation of irrigation solutions in itself and transmits to the root canal through a needle (13)(14)(15).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%