2000
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-200002000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancellous Allograft in Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
2
28
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Despite the doubts of some authors like Tomford et al, 27 who postulate that only the addition of growth factors would mean that allografts could be osteoinductor, many clinical studies support allograft use and their potential to induce efficient bone repair. 28,29 The present study confirms the active intervention of allografts, even autoclavated, in bone remodeling modulation. One could suppose that frozen and no autoclavated allografts could maintain inside them active growth factors or proteins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…26 Despite the doubts of some authors like Tomford et al, 27 who postulate that only the addition of growth factors would mean that allografts could be osteoinductor, many clinical studies support allograft use and their potential to induce efficient bone repair. 28,29 The present study confirms the active intervention of allografts, even autoclavated, in bone remodeling modulation. One could suppose that frozen and no autoclavated allografts could maintain inside them active growth factors or proteins.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Histological examination of retrieved cemented THRs confirmed that radiolucent lines represent areas of cancellization and thinning of the endosteal cortex [24]. Although interpretations of radiographs are difficult, radiolucent lines were observed after impaction allografting and were correlated with stem subsidence [22,26]. These results suggest that the endosteal circulation may be damaged and impaired after a revision with impaction allografting, resulting in medullary widening and potential stem subsidence.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…This vigorous procedure exposes to fracture that remains one of the major complications of the impaction technique (72,(116)(117). Three to five times fewer hammer shocks were needed to impact the freezedried irradiated bone correctly, and less energy was needed to compact the material due to its loss of ductility, reducing the risk of per-operative fracture.…”
Section: Implant Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%