Cancer and COVID-19 research studies with team science: a bibliometric study

Ghamgosar, Arezoo; Panahi, Sirous; Nemati-Anaraki, Leila

doi:10.1080/13561820.2022.2115986

Cited by 6 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 33 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The analysis of journals and co-cited journals offers valuable insights into the landscape of publications, aiding scholars in identifying suitable journals for their research endeavors[14]. Since 1992, a total of 1,285 journals have disseminated articles in the field of brainstem tumors.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…While the h-index effectively gauges academic impact over one's scientific career, it tends to disadvantage junior and potentially promising scientists due to their shorter career lengths. To address this, the m-index, introduced by Leo The analysis of journals and co-cited journals offers valuable insights into the landscape of publications, aiding scholars in identifying suitable journals for their research endeavors [14]. Since 1992, a total of 1,285 journals have disseminated articles in the field of brainstem tumors.…”

Section: General Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Bibliometric analysis of emerging trends and research foci in brainstem tumor field over thirty years (1992-2023)

Geng,

Xie,

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Over the past several decades, numerous articles have been published on brainstem tumors. However, there has been limited bibliometric analysis in this field. Therefore, we conducted a bibliometric analysis to elucidate the evolution and current status of brainstem tumor research. Methods: We retrieved 5,927 studies published in English between 1992 and 2023 from the Web of Science Core Collection database. We employed bibliometric tools and VOSviewer to conduct the analysis. Results: We identified and included a total of 5,927 publications for further analysis. The number of annual publications has exhibited steady growth over time. The United States accounted for the highest number of publications and total citations. The St. Jude Children's Research Hospital emerged as the most productive institution, while the Journal of Neurosurgery was the leading journal in terms of publication output. Among individual researchers, Liwei Zhang had the highest number of publications, while Eric Bouffet received the most citations in this field. The study titled "Somatic Histone H3 Alterations in Pediatric Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas and Non-brainstem Glioblastomas" stood out as the most cited work in this field. Keyword analysis revealed that immune therapy and epigenetic research are the focal points of this field. Conclusion: Our bibliometric analysis underscores the enduring significance of brainstem tumors in the realm of neuro-oncology research. The field's hotspots have transitioned from surgery and radiochemotherapy to investigating epigenetic mechanisms and immune therapy.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: General Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of emerging trends and research foci in brainstem tumor field over thirty years (1992-2023)

Geng,

Xie,

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The analysis of journals and co-cited journals offers valuable insights into the landscape of publications, aiding scholars in identifying suitable journals for their research endeavors [15]. Since 1992, a total of 1,159 journals have disseminated articles in the eld of brainstem tumors.…”

Section: General Informationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Bibliometric analysis of emerging trends and research foci in brainstem tumor field over thirty years (1992-2023)

Geng,

Xie,

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose: Over the past several decades, numerous articles have been published on brainstem tumors. However, there has been limited bibliometric analysis in this field. Therefore, we conducted a bibliometric analysis to elucidate the evolution and current status of brainstem tumor research. Methods: We retrieved 5,525 studies published in English between 1992 and 2023 from the Web of Science Core Collection database. We employed bibliometric tools and VOSviewer to conduct the analysis. Results: We included a total of 5,525 publications for further analysis. The annual publications has exhibited steady growth over time. The United States accounted for the highest number of publications and total citations. Among individual researchers, Liwei Zhang had the highest number of publications, while Eric Bouffet received the most citations in this field. The study titled "Somatic Histone H3 Alterations in Pediatric Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Gliomas and Non-brainstem Glioblastomas" stood out as the most cited work in this field. Keyword analysis revealed that immune therapy and epigenetic research are the focal points of this field. Conclusions: Our bibliometric analysis underscores the enduring significance of brainstem tumors in the realm of neuro-oncology research. The field's hotspots have transitioned from surgery and radiochemotherapy to investigating epigenetic mechanisms and immune therapy.

show abstract

“…This trans-disciplinary team has over 300 manuscripts, 44 patent applications, and clinical trials impacting thousands of pediatric patients [3,4], a feat that would have been difficult for one individual to accomplish. Goals can also be very specific and time-sensitive such as developing a vaccine for a new virus [5] and responding to a global pandemic in the cancer field [6]. These examples of both long-and short-term goals brought together diverse, trans-disciplinary groups of researchers and clinicians, enabling substantial changes in our understanding of disease and the ability to treat patients at a faster pace than if each worked alone.…”

Section: The Importance Of Trans-disciplinary Team Science In Cancermentioning

confidence: 99%

Critical Partnerships: How to Develop a Trans-Disciplinary Research Team

Waite,

Pronovost,

Barnholtz-Sloan

2023

Cancers

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Trans-disciplinary science will continue to be critical for the next wave of scientific advancement to fully understand cancer development, progression, and treatment. The shift from the independent investigator to either leading or being a productive member of a scientific team can be successful by focusing on some key elements that can build and strengthen interactions with a diverse group of people. These include the selection of the team, communication, leadership and mentorship, shared goals, responsibility to the team, authorship, and proactively dealing with conflict. While there are extensive books written on developing teams in the business world, and larger pieces in the medical arena, we attempt to provide here a concise, high-level view as a starting point for those that may be moving from being an independent researcher and are developing their own, larger, trans-disciplinary teams.

show abstract

Cancer and COVID-19 research studies with team science: a bibliometric study

Cited by 6 publications

References 33 publications

Bibliometric analysis of emerging trends and research foci in brainstem tumor field over thirty years (1992-2023)

Bibliometric analysis of emerging trends and research foci in brainstem tumor field over thirty years (1992-2023)

Bibliometric analysis of emerging trends and research foci in brainstem tumor field over thirty years (1992-2023)

Critical Partnerships: How to Develop a Trans-Disciplinary Research Team

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About