2015
DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0082-ra
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Biomarkers: The Role of Structured Data Reporting

Abstract: Context.-The College of American Pathologists has been producing cancer protocols since 1986 to aid pathologists in the diagnosis and reporting of cancer cases. Many pathologists use the included cancer case summaries as templates for dictation/data entry into the final pathology report. These summaries are now available in a computer-readable format with structured data elements for interoperability, packaged as ''electronic cancer checklists.'' Most major vendors of anatomic pathology reporting software supp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance and challenges of reporting cancer genetic testing was highlighted recently by the College of American Pathology, which proposed an XML-based electronic cancer checklist that could be implemented with a system similar to the one we described here. 6 However, the XML document that was developed would not necessarily be extensible to other third-party laboratories or clinical sites. One potential solution would be to use the interoperable Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard from Health Level Seven International, which uses the SMART platform (SMART on FHIR Genomics).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The importance and challenges of reporting cancer genetic testing was highlighted recently by the College of American Pathology, which proposed an XML-based electronic cancer checklist that could be implemented with a system similar to the one we described here. 6 However, the XML document that was developed would not necessarily be extensible to other third-party laboratories or clinical sites. One potential solution would be to use the interoperable Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard from Health Level Seven International, which uses the SMART platform (SMART on FHIR Genomics).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This disconnect can create challenges in reporting important genetic information from the laboratory to the treating oncologist. 6 Oncologists at Vanderbilt University Medical Center (VUMC) have partnered with Foundation Medicine Incorporated (FMI, Cambridge, MA), a provider of tumor exome sequencing, to analyze patients' tumors for genetic variants that may inform clinical decision making. 7 This collaboration, like most with third-party laboratories, has relied on the use of faxed documents to report test results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Searchable formats are recommended to facilitate audit of institutional or pathologist-specific prevalence. 131,[143][144][145][146][147] No Explanatory note.…”
Section: Reporting Of Predictive Pd-l1 Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anatomic pathology (AP) observations assess physical and morphologic alterations of tissue, and molecular pathology (MP) observations address subcellular changes in the genetic or protein structure of the cells. 21 , 22 Synoptic questions semantically conform to the “Observable” entity hierarchy of the SNOMED CT concept model, as well as to the intended semantics of LOINC. LOINC 23 is specified for representing laboratory test order questions, and SNOMED CT 24 is mandated for populating categorical answer value sets within Meaningful Use guidelines as issued by the Office of the National Coordinator.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%