Cancer Cell Growth Is Differentially Affected by Constitutive Activation of NRF2 by KEAP1 Deletion and Pharmacological Activation of NRF2 by the Synthetic Triterpenoid, RTA 405

Abstract

Synthetic triterpenoids are antioxidant inflammation modulators (AIMs) that exhibit broad anticancer activity. AIMs bind to KEAP1 and inhibit its ability to promote NRF2 degradation. As a result, NRF2 increases transcription of genes that restore redox balance and reduce inflammation. AIMs inhibit tumor growth and metastasis by increasing NRF2 activity in the tumor microenvironment and by modulating the activity of oncogenic signaling pathways, including NF-κB, in tumor cells. Accumulating evidence suggests that KEAP1 loss or mutation—which results in high levels of sustained NRF2 activity—may promote cancer growth and increase chemoresistance. Loss of KEAP1 also increases the levels of other oncogenic proteins, including IKKβ and BCL2. The apparent survival advantage provided to some tumor cells by loss of functional KEAP1 raises the question of whether pharmacological inhibition of KEAP1 could promote tumor growth. To address this issue, we characterized the basal levels of KEAP1 and NRF2 in a panel of human tumor cell lines and profiled the activity of an AIM, RTA 405. We found that in tumor cell lines with low or mutant KEAP1, and in Keap1 -/- murine embryonic fibroblasts, multiple KEAP1 targets including NRF2, IKKβ, and BCL2 were elevated. Keap1 -/- murine embryonic fibroblasts also had higher rates of proliferation and colony formation than their wild-type counterparts. In cells with functional KEAP1, RTA 405 increased NRF2 levels, but not IKKβ or BCL2 levels, and did not increase cell proliferation or survival. Moreover, RTA 405 inhibited growth at similar concentrations in cells with different basal NRF2 activity levels and in cells with wild-type or mutant KRAS. Finally, pre-treatment with RTA 405 did not protect tumor cells from doxorubicin- or cisplatin-mediated growth inhibition. Collectively, these data demonstrate that pharmacological activation of NRF2 by AIMs is distinct from genetic activation and does not provide a growth or survival advantage to tumor cells.

Multimodal actions of the phytochemical sulforaphane suppress both AR and AR-V7 in 22Rv1 cells: Advocating a potent pharmaceutical combination against castration-resistant prostate cancer

“…Although we did not carry out in depth mechanistic studies using the G+BM combination, numerous investigators have shown the potent Hsp90 inhibitory effect of G ( 72 , 75 ) and the potent Nrf2 inductive effect of BM ( 76 , 77 ). In addition, our previous published finding documented that overexpression of Nrf2 can suppress the expression and function of AR-FL in both LNCaP and C4-2B cells ( 42 ).…”

Resveratrol‐Induced Downregulation of NAF‐1 Enhances the Sensitivity of Pancreatic Cancer Cells to Gemcitabine via the ROS/Nrf2 Signaling Pathways

“…However, more recent data reveal its role also as a tumor suppressor [ 32 , 33 ]. For example, Probst et al [ 34 ] found that genetic activation of Nrf2 and pharmacological activation of Nrf2 by RTA 405 are distinct, which suppress cancer cell survival and promote apoptosis. Resveratrol, the same as an antioxidant inflammation modulator, may have the same pharmacology action and mechanism and promotes the apoptosis of pancreatic cancer cells via activation of Nrf2 pathway.…”

Comparative Gene Expression Analysis in WM164 Melanoma Cells Revealed That β-β-Dimethylacrylshikonin Leads to ROS Generation, Loss of Mitochondrial Membrane Potential, and Autophagy Induction

“…For example, it has been shown that RTA 405 did not reduce the sensitivity of cancer cells towards doxorubicin and cisplatin, despite increased Nrf2 activity. Moreover, such compounds even enhanced the cytotoxicity of chemotherapeutics [ 22 ]. Similar results were also obtained for bardoxolone methyl in combination with carboplatin and paclitaxel in a mouse lung cancer model [ 23 ].…”