2016
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.201670051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Immunotherapy: Comprehensive Mechanism Analysis of Mesoporous‐Silica‐Nanoparticle‐Induced Cancer Immunotherapy (Adv. Healthcare Mater. 10/2016)

Abstract: A plain mesoporous silica (MS) nanoparticle without any immunomodulatory molecules enhances anti-cancer immunity in vivo. On page 1169, X.P. Wang, N. M. Tsuji, A. Ito and co-workers show that a plain MS nanoparticle promotes both Th1 and Th2 immune responses, and enhances the effector memory of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell populations in the three most important immune organs (bone marrow, lymph node and spleen) of mice.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The neoantigen-adjuvant vaccines and the neoantigen-pulsed DC vaccines were prepared for individualized tumor treatments. On one hand, peptide vaccines have the advantages of simple synthesis, economical production, and clinical safety; on the other hand, peptide vaccines have two major shortcomings: low immunogenicity and MHC restriction [6]. Hence, currently, the most common solution is to add an immunological adjuvant, which is essential for inducing an effective immune response [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The neoantigen-adjuvant vaccines and the neoantigen-pulsed DC vaccines were prepared for individualized tumor treatments. On one hand, peptide vaccines have the advantages of simple synthesis, economical production, and clinical safety; on the other hand, peptide vaccines have two major shortcomings: low immunogenicity and MHC restriction [6]. Hence, currently, the most common solution is to add an immunological adjuvant, which is essential for inducing an effective immune response [28].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peptide vaccines have been extensively studied, because they are simple, safe, and economical [4]. However, due to their unique peptide epitopes, low molecular weights, easy degradation, and short half-lives, peptide vaccines have two basic limitations: low immunogenicity and major histocompatibility complex (MHC) restriction [5,6]. Therefore, adding immunological adjuvants to peptide vaccines is essential to induce an effective immune response [7].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During recent years where the use of engineered nanoparticles has increased rapidly, silica nanoparticles have become one of the most commonly used nanomaterials in amongst others, biomedical research as a result of several benefits including biocompatibility, stability, and low production costs [11]. As an example, the field of cancer immunotherapy increasingly looks into the use of amorphous silica as immunoadjuvant to treat cancer in humans [12,13,14]. Despite their common and increased use, cytotoxic effects have been reported [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…88 However, the application of peptide vaccines is limited due to their unique peptide epitopes, low molecular weight, simple degradation and short half-life. 89,90 Nucleic acid vaccines are mainly divided into DNA vaccine and mRNA vaccine. 91 Nucleic acid vaccines offer greater advantages over peptide vaccines in terms of efficacy, reduced design and manufacturing time, and manufacturing scalability and reliability.…”
Section: Neoantigen Vaccinementioning
confidence: 99%