1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0215(19960328)66:1<75::aid-ijc14>3.0.co;2-a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer in Rwanda

Abstract: Data are presented on the frequency of malignant tumours registered at the population-based cancer registry in the southern prefecture of Butare, Rwanda, from May 1991 until 2 months before the outbreak of civil war in April 1994. Beginning in 1992, subjects were also interviewed about socio-demographic and lifestyle factors that have been associated with cancer risk in the West. The distribution of cancer in Rwanda is similar to that in other countries in sub-Saharan Africa. The most frequent cancers are thos… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
13
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Laboratory verification of cancer diagnosis (for example, by histology, cytology or blood chemistry) was available on 60% of cases (all of which were invasive tumours) and 63% of controls. Typical of studies in developing countries where laboratory services are limited, this proportion compares favourably with other cancer series reported from Africa (Bassett et al, 1995;Newton et al, 1996a;Wabinga et al, 2000). Another potentially important source of bias is the high proportion of adults who were not tested for HIV in the early stages of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Laboratory verification of cancer diagnosis (for example, by histology, cytology or blood chemistry) was available on 60% of cases (all of which were invasive tumours) and 63% of controls. Typical of studies in developing countries where laboratory services are limited, this proportion compares favourably with other cancer series reported from Africa (Bassett et al, 1995;Newton et al, 1996a;Wabinga et al, 2000). Another potentially important source of bias is the high proportion of adults who were not tested for HIV in the early stages of the study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…No analysis of ethnic distribution was attempted because no reliable information was available. This relatively low level of oral cancer in this population corroborates similar findings in Zimbabwe (7) and Rwanda (8).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…With the obvious exception of Mali, higher rates of cancer tend to be found in populations residing at higher altitude. Studies of the relative frequencies of cancers, for example in Southern Rwanda (Ngendahayo and Parkin, 1986;Newton et al, 1996) at an altitude of 1500-2000 m and the Kilimanjaro area of Tanzania (Lauren and Kitinya, 1986) at an altitude of 1000 m have supported this finding. Relative frequency data from the 1950s and 1960s suggest that the probable high incidence in these areas is long-standing (Cook and Burkitt, 1971) and that it extended also into Burundi and neighbouring Zaire as well as Tanzania.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%