2002
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer incidence among workers in the asbestos-cement producing industry in Norway

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
27
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
27
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…But still these concentrations were low compared with the airborne dust levels reported in other studies. In a recent paper from Norway the gravimetric data shoved concentrations of 0.2-22.8 mg/m 3 , and the fiber concentrations were estimated to be between 100 and 1900 f/ml in 1964, with less than 5 f/ml for later years (20). In the Norwegian study no case of mesothelioma was found among those with less than 5 years of employment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…But still these concentrations were low compared with the airborne dust levels reported in other studies. In a recent paper from Norway the gravimetric data shoved concentrations of 0.2-22.8 mg/m 3 , and the fiber concentrations were estimated to be between 100 and 1900 f/ml in 1964, with less than 5 f/ml for later years (20). In the Norwegian study no case of mesothelioma was found among those with less than 5 years of employment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The smoking habits of the cohort members were not known. The Norwegian study (20) showed an excess risk of lung cancer, but no trend in risk by duration of employment. This lack of dose-response relationship is in accordance with the results of other Nordic studies from the asbestos-cement industry with duration of exposure as a dose surrogate (20,23).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Relative risks of mesothelioma following asbestos exposure have varied widely in previous studies. Two recent cohort studies in Norway and Israel found standardized incidence ratios above 5000 (Tulchinsky et al, 1999;Ulvestad et al, 2002). The risk of developing mesothelioma has been estimated as proportional to a third or fourth power of time since first occupational exposure to asbestos (Peto et al, 1982).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cohort studies found increased incidence and mortality from mesothelioma among (chiefly male) asbestos workers employed in mining (Piolatto et al, 1990;McDonald et al, 1993), but mainly textile and manufacture (Newhouse and Berry, 1979;Berry et al, 2000;Yano et al, 2001), insulation (Selikoff et al, 1979) and asbestos-cement factories (Tulchinsky et al, 1999;Ulvestad et al, 2002). Mesothelioma risk varied widely among different studies, according to types of asbestos involved (chrysotile, amosite or crocidolite) (Hodgson and Darnton, 2000) and levels of exposure (Doll and Peto, 1985).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some recent studies clearly show the influence of exposure duration on mesothelioma risk. Ulvestad et al 58) have analyzed the cancer incidence among workers of an asbestoscement industry in Norway. No mesothelioma case was observed among people with less than 5 yr of employment.…”
Section: Duration Of Exposurementioning
confidence: 99%