1987
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.2088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer mortality of granite workers.

Abstract: KOSKELA R-S, KLOCKARS M, JARVINEN E, KOLARI PJ, ROSSI A. Cancer mortality of granite workers. Scand J Work Environ Health 13 (1987) 26-31. A retrospective cohort study was undertaken to investigate the cancer mortality of granite workers. The study comprised I 026 workers hired between 1940 and 1971. The number of person-years was 20 165, and the number of deaths 235. During the total follow-up 46 tumors were observed and 44.9 were expected. An exess mortality from tumors was observed for the workers followed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inconsistencies in the earlier reported results can be explained by differences in (i) study design, (ii) the internal structure of the cohort [period of entry, period of follow-up, age structure, and occurrence of disease (eg, tumors) in the population], (iii) potential confounders and methods of analysis , and (iv) differences in exposure intensity and duration (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Inconsistencies in the earlier reported results can be explained by differences in (i) study design, (ii) the internal structure of the cohort [period of entry, period of follow-up, age structure, and occurrence of disease (eg, tumors) in the population], (iii) potential confounders and methods of analysis , and (iv) differences in exposure intensity and duration (18,19).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other tumors reported as primary (N = 9) or secondary (N = 2) causes were not concentrated in any specific category of cancer diagnosis. A closer analysis of the cancer mortality can be found in another paper (19).…”
Section: Mortalitymentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Data from the 1973 cross sectional survey showed that smoking habits were comparable among workers at the two mines, with current smokers accounting for 64-7% in the mine A and 67 1% in the mine B workforce; corresponding figures for former smokers were 7 9 and 7-2%.24 National and regional data on smoking habits are available for the general male population aged >1134 or >14"3 not broken down by age groups, thus not directly comparable with the mining population surveyed in 1973. A survey on smoking habits among students in northern Sardinia found that current smokers accounted for 26% of males aged [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20], and the same proportion was 63% at age 20.36 This figure is probably the closest to the general Sardinian male population of the same age as miners surveyed in 1973, but it is not sufficiently precise to estimate the confounding effect of smoking on risk of lung cancer in our cohort study. Other authors used the SMR for cancer sites other than the lung that are presumably related to smoking (oral cavity, pancreas, larynx, kidney, and bladder) to evaluate the confounding effect on the risk estimate for lung cancer.5 With the same approach, a total of 16 deaths from those cancers were observed among underground miners in mine A v 16-7 expected, and 21 were observed v 21-5 expected among underground miners in mine B.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A Finnish study (24) among granite workers showed an overall standardized mortality ratio (SMR) of 129 for lung cancer (22 observed, 17. I expected).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%