Cancer patients’ experiences and preferences when receiving bad news: a qualitative study

Abstract

Purpose Receiving a cancer diagnosis significantly impacts patients’ lives, and how the bad news is delivered influences patients’ trajectory, psychosocial adjustment and openness to psycho-oncological support. We explored how patients’ experiences, reactions and preferences were when receiving the news and which optimization recommendations can be made. Methods We conducted an exploratory qualitative study with patients who enrolled in the new integrated cross-sectoral psycho-oncological care programme ‘isPO’, being enrolled 12 months post-diagnosis. Data on the main issue (i.e. perception of the moment when the diagnosis is received) were collected via telephone interviews that were fully audiotaped and transcribed. Two independent coders conducted inductive content analyses using MAXQDA. Results Out of 38 approached patients, 23 cancer patients with 13 different tumour entities participated. They had a mean age of 54.2 (SD 16.2); n = 17 (74%) were female. Three major themes with 14 corresponding subthemes emerged: (1) patients’ experiences with the bad news delivery, including setting, mode, preparation and perceived needs; (2) patients’ reactions to the bad news, such as shock, fear and helplessness, disbelief and denial, anger and feeling of injustice, thankfulness and depression; and (3) patients’ receiving preferences, including psycho-oncological support, addressing informational needs, needs-driven comprehensive support and a competent multidisciplinary support team. Conclusions The quality of bad news delivery and addressing patients’ needs should be strongly considered by physicians. We recommend integrating patients’ perspective on the quality management processes of breaking bad news. For providing needs-centred high-quality care, applying existing guidelines and acquiring patient-centred communication skills are central.

Use, applicability, and dissemination of patient versions of clinical practice guidelines in oncology in Germany: a qualitative interview study with healthcare providers

“…Most participants favoured distributing PVGs around the time of diagnosis. This is in line with findings of a qualitative study, which found that oncological patients require relevant health information from a very early start [ 34 ]. Only one interviewed participant in our study recommended dissemination at a later stage (e.g.…”

Informed consent in cancer clinical care: Perspectives of healthcare professionals on information disclosure at a tertiary institution in Uganda

“…Doctors in this study reported that oftentimes they convene meetings between the medical team and the patient’s family to decide on how best to communicate potentially distressing information to the patient, especially for the very sick and terminally ill. Breaking bad news to cancer patients is never easy [ 38 , 39 ]. In several parts of the world, physicians prefer to discuss with families and break bad news to family members and let them decide whether the patient should be informed [ 40 – 43 ].…”

Cognition and Attitudes of Hospice Care among Healthcare Providers: A Quantitative Study

“…It suggests that hospitals should emphasize the primary position of patients and their families, and pay more attention to cultivating the communication skills of health care providers, then help them learn how to make decisions from the perspective of patients and their families. The SPIKES mode [38,39,40] and SHARE mode [41,42,43] are available for reference.…”