1996
DOI: 10.1097/00003086-199608001-00025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Risk After Metal on Metal and Polyethylene on Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
129
2
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 249 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
9
129
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Theoretically, there is potential risk of mutagenicity and hypersensitivity [33,35]. In fact, the carcinogenic risk is not increased in subjects receiving metalon-metal hip prostheses compared to those with metal-onpolyethylene hip prostheses [33,37]. All metal implants release metal ions because of corrosion effects for instance after total knee arthroplasty which show metallic ion levels similar to those in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Theoretically, there is potential risk of mutagenicity and hypersensitivity [33,35]. In fact, the carcinogenic risk is not increased in subjects receiving metalon-metal hip prostheses compared to those with metal-onpolyethylene hip prostheses [33,37]. All metal implants release metal ions because of corrosion effects for instance after total knee arthroplasty which show metallic ion levels similar to those in metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, no reports of mutagenic/teratogenic effects in patients with metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty have been published [37]. The placenta could modulate the rate of metallic ion (cobalt and chromium) transfer and to date there has been no significant effect on the child [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As reported in the literature, measurements of serum levels of metals might have been useful for initial diagnosis [11]. Apparently, there is no increase in the incidence of malignancies in patients exposed to metal particles [12], but in patients with metal-on-metal bearings, hypersensitivity to metals is higher than in normal population, especially in those with failed implants [9,13]. Massive wear and extensive metallosis must be avoided.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the CoCr alloys, Cr and Ni have established carcinogenic compounds, and Co is classified as a possible carcinogen itself. 1 Evidence of these effects in experimental studies in vitro and in vivo raised a question about the possible increased risk of local and remote neoplasm in patients who underwent joint replacement. Several authors compared the incidence of neoplasm in the general population against that in patients with joint prostheses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5 In a later study, Visuri et al compared a cohort of patients with McKee-Farrar prostheses with patients with metal-on-polyethylene articulation: Both cohorts showed a lower incidence of cancer with respect to the general population, but the risk was lower in the metalpolyethylene group than in the metal-metal group. 1 The release of metal particles and ions from the McKee-Farrar prostheses was hypothesized to be the cause of the increased risk of lymphoma and leukemia. 6,7 The interest about the McKee-Farrar study was renewed since, metal-on-metal articulation from cobalt-chromiummolybdenum alloy was reintroduced into hip arthroplasty as an alternative to polyethylene and ceramic components in 1988.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%