2018
DOI: 10.1088/1755-1315/173/1/012038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer risks from head radiography procedures

Abstract: Abstract. The goal of this study is to evaluate the risk of cancer induction in head radiography procedures with a view to promote dose optimization and enhance patient safety. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD 100) was used to determine the entrance surface dose (ESD) of 20 patients presented for head radiography in two tertiary healthcare institutions in Southwest Nigeria. The corresponding effective dose and doses to the brain, oral mucosa and salivary gland were evaluated using PCXMC software. Incidence can… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of this study are consistent with the results of our previous studies, which used X-rays from a skull radiography device as the LDR to induce a radioadaptation response [12]. Exposure doses of X-ray in head or skull radiography ranges from 3.01 to 19.12 mGy with a mean of 7.52 mGy [17], while this study used low-dose gamma rays of 50 mGy and 100 mGy. The increased priming irradiation doses up to 50 mGy and 100 mGy to induce radioadaptation response factually gives the similar results with dose of priming irradiation on skull radiography.…”
Section: Sod2supporting
confidence: 90%
“…The results of this study are consistent with the results of our previous studies, which used X-rays from a skull radiography device as the LDR to induce a radioadaptation response [12]. Exposure doses of X-ray in head or skull radiography ranges from 3.01 to 19.12 mGy with a mean of 7.52 mGy [17], while this study used low-dose gamma rays of 50 mGy and 100 mGy. The increased priming irradiation doses up to 50 mGy and 100 mGy to induce radioadaptation response factually gives the similar results with dose of priming irradiation on skull radiography.…”
Section: Sod2supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Imaging modalities have been noted to deliver to patients in a wide range of doses [20,[22][23][24][25][26][27]. Same trend has been observed in this study; there is a large variation in the entrance surface dose (ESD) within the same hospital and from one center to others (Table 2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Radiographic equipment is widely in use globally. It has the highest frequency of imaging examinations as compared to other imaging modalities [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. Approximately 64% of all medical diagnostic examinations are from radiographic equipment [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Performance assessment of radiographic equipment cannot be over-emphasized. A little shift in any radiographic parameter has a significant impact on the patient absorbed dose [15], especially due to the incidence of cancer induction from radiographic examinations [6], [16]. It is therefore important that radiographic units be assessed before usage and periodically to ensure proper functioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%