2017
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-01052-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer-specific PERK signaling drives invasion and metastasis through CREB3L1

Abstract: PERK signaling is required for cancer invasion and there is interest in targeting this pathway for therapy. Unfortunately, chemical inhibitors of PERK’s kinase activity cause on-target side effects that have precluded their further development. One strategy for resolving this difficulty would be to target downstream components of the pathway that specifically mediate PERK’s pro-invasive and metastatic functions. Here we identify the transcription factor CREB3L1 as an essential mediator of PERK’s pro-metastatic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
98
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 112 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
7
98
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, whereas translation reprogramming is clearly associated with cancer progression (Sendoel et al, 2017), how changes in the translation of specific mRNAs lead cells to undergo a proliferative-to-invasive phenotypic transition is only beginning to be understood. For example, PERK's pro-metastatic function in breast cancer has been attributed in part to activation of the transcription factor CREB3L1/OASIS (Feng et al, 2017). Interestingly, translation of the EMT-associated transcription factors SNAIL1, TWIST, and ZEB2 is promoted by YB-1, an RNA-binding protein and transcription factor that plays a pleiotropic role in cancer progression (Lasham et al, 2013), which, like eIF2a phosphorylation, also suppresses global cap-dependent translation (Evdokimova et al, 2009).…”
Section: Translation Reprogramming and Invasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, whereas translation reprogramming is clearly associated with cancer progression (Sendoel et al, 2017), how changes in the translation of specific mRNAs lead cells to undergo a proliferative-to-invasive phenotypic transition is only beginning to be understood. For example, PERK's pro-metastatic function in breast cancer has been attributed in part to activation of the transcription factor CREB3L1/OASIS (Feng et al, 2017). Interestingly, translation of the EMT-associated transcription factors SNAIL1, TWIST, and ZEB2 is promoted by YB-1, an RNA-binding protein and transcription factor that plays a pleiotropic role in cancer progression (Lasham et al, 2013), which, like eIF2a phosphorylation, also suppresses global cap-dependent translation (Evdokimova et al, 2009).…”
Section: Translation Reprogramming and Invasionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, overexpression of XBP1 could promote cell invasion and metastasis by upregulating MMP9 in ESCC [28]. Similarly, PERK also contributes to ECM reorganization in breast cancer and overexpression of ATF4, which is a component of PERK pathway, induces cell invasion and metastasis, stimulating MMP2 and MMP7 expression in ESCC [13]. These evidences suggest that UPR activation might be relevant for the development of tumor metastasis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress is believed to contribute to several steps along with the metastasis and proliferation process of various types of cancers. For example, ER proteins such as XBP1, PERK, ATF6and ATF4 involved in ER stress have been reported to be participate in tumor growth and metastasis [12][13][14][15]. However, the underlying mechanisms responsible for metastasis and proliferation of TC are still poorly understood.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…*, P Ͻ 0.05; **, P Ͻ 0.01. inhibits PKR when expressed by the EUs11 virus (44,49,50). Another possibility is that ΔN146 may abrogate eIF2␣ phosphorylation mediated by PERK or GCN2, both of which are often activated under oncogenic stress in tumor cells (41,42,51,52). An additional possibility is to block the antiviral action of interferon-stimulated genes, such as IFIT1, IFIT3, Rsad2 (viperin), and Mx2.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3C and D, levels of expression of eIF2␣ were comparable in mock-and virusinfected cells. Interestingly, phosphorylated eIF2␣ was presented in mock-infected cells, which is presumably due to oncogenic stress (41,42). While wild-type virus inhibited eIF2␣ phosphorylation, Δ␥ 1 34.5 aggravated its phosphorylation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%