2016
DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2015-001018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer symptom scale preferences: does one size fit all?

Abstract: VAS was the least favoured scale and should be used cautiously in this population. Most participants had a scale preference with high intrapatient consistency between scales. CRS was preferred for appetite loss and tiredness and NRS for pain. Consideration should be given to individualised cancer symptom assessment according to patient scale preference.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The vulnerability of our patients is also evident from the fact that about 40% of our patients were admitted via the emergency room or directly from home care, which suggests that a SIPC treatment was not proactively planned or not sufficient, but an emergency admission necessary. Other studies with potentially other admission policies report considerably lower ECOG performance status in oncology patients on a palliative care unit of ECOG 2 in median [34]. In contrast to MIDOS, IPOS assessment includes additional psychosocial problems with family or friends being anxious or worried about him/her, feeling anxious or worried about his/her illness or treatment, and feeling depressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The vulnerability of our patients is also evident from the fact that about 40% of our patients were admitted via the emergency room or directly from home care, which suggests that a SIPC treatment was not proactively planned or not sufficient, but an emergency admission necessary. Other studies with potentially other admission policies report considerably lower ECOG performance status in oncology patients on a palliative care unit of ECOG 2 in median [34]. In contrast to MIDOS, IPOS assessment includes additional psychosocial problems with family or friends being anxious or worried about him/her, feeling anxious or worried about his/her illness or treatment, and feeling depressed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, sensory‐compromised situations, most often associated with taste and smell dysfunctionality are not confined to the elderly. Multiple aetiologies, including chemotherapy for cancer (Murtaza et al ., ; Jeter et al ., ), Alzheimer's disease (Sergi et al ., ; Boesveldt et al ., ), sinonasal disease and anosmia (Whitcroft et al ., ), can lead to poor appetite and potential malnutrition. Furthermore, cancer associated cachexia patients (Werner et al ., ; Baracos et al ., ; Crawford, ), could significantly benefit from development of high‐nutrient functional food products with soft texture characteristics as an aid to ease swallowing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NRS used in E2C2 to assess the SPADE symptoms and physical function will be patterned on the extensively validated MD Anderson Symptom Inventory and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System for the 24-h recall period and the verbal anchors (e.g. from no pain to worst possible pain) [84,85], NRSs have been shown to be more responsive than either Likert or verbal rating scales [86] and to be preferred by patients over visual analogue scales [87].…”
Section: Primary Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%