2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancer Treatment Side Effects: A Meta-analysis of the Relationship Between Response Expectancies and Experience

Abstract: Findings support a relationship between REs and a wide range of subsequent side effects, yet differences between individual RE-toxicity associations emerged. These findings provide direction for the measurement of side effects and REs and support REs as potential targets for intervention during the informed consent process.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
4

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
55
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In keeping with these results, a number of longitudinal studies have examined how prospective patient expectations are related to later experience of side effects and QOL in cancer survivors. Often referred to as response expectancies, these have been shown to have associations with actual experience of side effects in that, when certain side effects are expected, they are more likely to be later reported . This has been termed the “nocebo” effect and is considered a neurobiological problem influenced by the way in which information is presented to patients .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In keeping with these results, a number of longitudinal studies have examined how prospective patient expectations are related to later experience of side effects and QOL in cancer survivors. Often referred to as response expectancies, these have been shown to have associations with actual experience of side effects in that, when certain side effects are expected, they are more likely to be later reported . This has been termed the “nocebo” effect and is considered a neurobiological problem influenced by the way in which information is presented to patients .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Often referred to as response expectancies, these have been shown to have associations with actual experience of side effects in that, when certain side effects are expected, they are more likely to be later reported. 20,21,29,30 This has been termed the "nocebo" effect and is considered a neurobiological problem influenced by the way in which information is presented to patients. 31 The nocebo effect has also been demonstrated in prostate cancer 32 where pre-treatment expectations were associated with QOL following RP or radiotherapy.…”
Section: The Importance Of Appraisals and Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cytotoxic drugs used in chemotherapy cause diverse adverse effects that include nausea and vomiting (NV), diarrhea, anorexia, and weight loss (Hofman et al, 2004;Devlin et al, 2017). These chemotherapy-induced side effects often interrupt drug treatment and negatively impact outcome of the therapy (Andreyev et al, 1998;Hess et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reactions, bone marrow suppression, and immunosuppression, leukopenia due to the toxicity of anti-cancer drugs accounts for a significant proportion of secondary leukopenia [10]. The major secondary cause of leukopenia is bone marrow suppression caused by anti-tumor drugs [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%