2020
DOI: 10.1051/mbcb/2020040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancerous lesions in the vicinity of dental implants: a systematic review

Abstract: Introduction: The massive diffusion of dental implant treatments in the last decades leads to the appearance of complications, most of them inflammatory, although important complications have been described as malignant lesions in the vicinity of dental implants. The objective of this article is to describe the cases described in the literature of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) or clinical variants and metastases, in the vicinity of dental implants and to analyze the possible etiological agents involved. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 63 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overexpression of the MYC gene and mutations in BRCA1/2 have also been associated with a higher likelihood of lymphomagenesis in patients following silicone implants [53,56,57]. Mutations in the p53 gene have also been described in the development of oral cancer after metal implants [58,59]. Currently, there is no evidence to support the presence of any specific common genetic component for the development of cancer in the pacemaker pocket among the patients described in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Overexpression of the MYC gene and mutations in BRCA1/2 have also been associated with a higher likelihood of lymphomagenesis in patients following silicone implants [53,56,57]. Mutations in the p53 gene have also been described in the development of oral cancer after metal implants [58,59]. Currently, there is no evidence to support the presence of any specific common genetic component for the development of cancer in the pacemaker pocket among the patients described in the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%