2019
DOI: 10.3390/cancers11091291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cancers after Chornobyl: From Epidemiology to Molecular Quantification

Abstract: An overview and new data are presented from cancer studies of the most exposed groups of the population after the Chornobyl accident, performed at the National Research Center for Radiation Medicine (NRCRM). Incidence rates of solid cancers were analyzed for the 1990–2016 period in cleanup workers, evacuees, and the general population from the contaminated areas. In male cleanup workers, the significant increase in rates was demonstrated for cancers in total, leukemia, lymphoma, and thyroid cancer, as well as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Unfortunately, cohort studies of cleanup workers from different countries cannot be accurately compared because of differences in reporting, registration, follow-up and analyses; mortality vs incidence outcomes; special health screenings or not; available information on cofactors (eg, education, ethnicity, smoking); methods of radiation dose determination; and effect measures such as SIR, SMR, excess relative risk per dose unit. [22][23][24] For example, the Russian cohort of 67 568 Chernobyl cleanup workers reported a statistically significant dose response for all incident solid cancers based on official recorded doses (arithmetic mean of 13 cGy) and over the follow-up period 1992 to 2009. 25 However, no attempt was possible, as the authors recognized, to estimate the impact of behavioral factors on cancer risk: "As a weakness of the present study, the analyses did not take into account recognized risk factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, genetic predisposition, marital status, education, occupational status."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Unfortunately, cohort studies of cleanup workers from different countries cannot be accurately compared because of differences in reporting, registration, follow-up and analyses; mortality vs incidence outcomes; special health screenings or not; available information on cofactors (eg, education, ethnicity, smoking); methods of radiation dose determination; and effect measures such as SIR, SMR, excess relative risk per dose unit. [22][23][24] For example, the Russian cohort of 67 568 Chernobyl cleanup workers reported a statistically significant dose response for all incident solid cancers based on official recorded doses (arithmetic mean of 13 cGy) and over the follow-up period 1992 to 2009. 25 However, no attempt was possible, as the authors recognized, to estimate the impact of behavioral factors on cancer risk: "As a weakness of the present study, the analyses did not take into account recognized risk factors such as smoking, alcohol consumption, genetic predisposition, marital status, education, occupational status."…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results are in accord with recent observations by Smailyte et al 21 showing increased risk of cancer sites related to smoking and alcohol use in the cohort of Lithuanian Chernobyl cleanup workers followed in 1986 to 2012. Unfortunately, cohort studies of cleanup workers from different countries cannot be accurately compared because of differences in reporting, registration, follow‐up and analyses; mortality vs incidence outcomes; special health screenings or not; available information on cofactors (eg, education, ethnicity, smoking); methods of radiation dose determination; and effect measures such as SIR, SMR, excess relative risk per dose unit 22‐24 . For example, the Russian cohort of 67 568 Chernobyl cleanup workers reported a statistically significant dose response for all incident solid cancers based on official recorded doses (arithmetic mean of 13 cGy) and over the follow‐up period 1992 to 2009 25 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of the radiogenicity of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) remains largely controversial, although a number of epidemiological studies have shown an elevated radiation-associated risk for CLL [1][2][3]. Besides, CLL is the most common form of leukemia among clean-up workers of Chornobyl Nuclear Power Plant accident [2,4].…”
Section: Doi: 1032471/exp-oncology2312-8852vol-42-no-314839mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Excess cases of thyroid cancer in exposed children were first detected after the accident in 1990. Such cases are continuing to accumulate, albeit at a much slower rate, now more than 30 years later ( 4 , 5 ). Bogdanova et al.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%