2015
DOI: 10.1177/1745691614556682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Candidate Gene–Environment Interaction Research

Abstract: Studying how genetic predispositions come together with environmental factors to contribute to complex behavioral outcomes has great potential for advancing our understanding of the development of psychopathology. It represents a clear theoretical advance over studying these factors in isolation. However, research at the intersection of multiple fields creates many challenges. We review several reasons why the rapidly expanding candidate gene-environment interaction (cGxE) literature should be considered with … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
316
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 332 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 160 publications
(220 reference statements)
5
316
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We selected a genetic marker ( ALDH2 rs671) and environmental effect (a measure of peer alcohol use) with strong empirical evidence and, respectively, biological and theoretical relevance (39). In our analyses we attempted to rule out potential confounders, including by controlling for all relevant gene × covariate and environment × covariate interactions (30) and by testing for gene–environment correlation (rGE) (39). Similar to the Irons et al (18) study, we found no rGE between ALDH2 *2 status and our measure of the peer environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We selected a genetic marker ( ALDH2 rs671) and environmental effect (a measure of peer alcohol use) with strong empirical evidence and, respectively, biological and theoretical relevance (39). In our analyses we attempted to rule out potential confounders, including by controlling for all relevant gene × covariate and environment × covariate interactions (30) and by testing for gene–environment correlation (rGE) (39). Similar to the Irons et al (18) study, we found no rGE between ALDH2 *2 status and our measure of the peer environment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample is small, and, thus, this study is limited in its statistical power [68], which might have contributed to some (or all) of the null results reported and discussed, and to the small amount of variance accounted by the two-way interaction involving 5-HTTLPR and intrusiveness. In consequence, interpretation and generalization of the results must be made carefully, and replication in larger samples of institutionally reared children is warranted.…”
Section: Limitations Of the Study And Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…First, statistical analysis for the main effect of the CNR1 SNPs and the CNR1 SNPs × RLE interactions on possible migraine and migraine‐related symptoms were carried out in the total sample, according to a recent guideline (Dick et al 2015). Pairwise deletion was used to handle missing data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%