Candidate Quality, the Personal Vote, and the Incumbency Advantage in Congress

Abstract

Most political observers agree that incumbent legislators have a considerable advantage over nonincumbents in modern congressional elections. Yet there is still disagreement over the exact source of this advantage and the explanation for its growth over time. To address this debate we utilize a unique set of historical elections data to test for the presence of an incumbency advantage in late-nineteenth-century House elections (1872–1900). We find a modest direct effect of incumbency and a substantial candidate quality effect. Moreover, the cartel-like control of ballot access by nineteenth century political parties created competition in races that the modern market-like system simply does not sustain. Our results suggest that candidate quality is a fundamental piece of the puzzle in understanding the historical development of the incumbency advantage in American politics.

Election results and opportunistic policies: A new test of the rational political business cycle model

“…10 Citizen-voters care about private consumption (c t ) and two types of public goods 7 During the period analyzed four local finance laws were introduced: Law 1/79, Decree-Law 98/84, Law 1/87, and Law 42/98. 8 For a detailed description of municipal finances in Portugal, see Veiga and Veiga (2007).…”

“…9 They are of course subject to several control mechanisms by central government agencies, but these are merely inspective. 10 The model is a simplified version of Rogoff (1990).…”

Campaign Duration and Election Outcomes

“…Scholars have traced incumbent strength to a number of sources [1][2][3], but an advantage in incumbent name recognition has emerged as a leading explanation [4]. As Jacobson notes, "people hesitate to vote for candidates they know nothing at all about.…”

Identifying the Source of Incumbency Advantage Through an Electoral Reform

“…Whilst it may simply convey an electorate's satisfaction with the elected representative, it can also pose a threat to equality of opportunities jeopardizing the competitiveness of electoral races and eventually political accountability (Carson et al, 2007). Thus the vast research dedicated to this phenomenon.…”