2016
DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Candidatus Phytoplasma cirsii’, a novel taxon from creeping thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.]

Abstract: Creeping thistle [Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop.] and dahlia (Dahlia sp.) plants showing typical symptoms of phytoplasma infection including yellowing, stunting, inflorescence and proliferation, were sampled; the presence of phytoplasma was confirmed by standard PCR using universal primers. RFLP analysis allowed classification of the detected phytoplasma strains CirYS, CirYS1 and DahlP within the 16SrXI group, the unique restriction profile F2nR2 fragment obtained in silico by iPhyClassifier indicated that they be… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was described in the Czech Republic in association with yellowing, stunting and proliferation of creeping thistle and dahlia [50]. Two strains, including the reference strain CirYS (GenBank accession number KR869146), are available.…”
Section: Comments On ‘Ca Phytoplasma’ Species Listed In Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was described in the Czech Republic in association with yellowing, stunting and proliferation of creeping thistle and dahlia [50]. Two strains, including the reference strain CirYS (GenBank accession number KR869146), are available.…”
Section: Comments On ‘Ca Phytoplasma’ Species Listed In Tablementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, based on the virtual RFLP analysis of all 16S rRNA gene sequences available at the time (F2nR2 fragment of about 1250 bp), the number of phytoplasma classification groups was expanded from 19 to 28 (16SrXIX-16SrXXVIII), and some potentially new species were proposed with suggested reference strains ( Table 3 ). In the present review, groups/subgroups corresponding to Candidatus Phytoplasma species, especially the newly named species are updated ( Table 3 [ 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 115 , 116 , 117 , 118 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 , 125 , 126 , 127 , 128 , 129 , 130 , 131 , 132 , 133 , 134 , 135 , 136 , 137 ]). Two new groups (16SrXXXVIII and 16SrXXXIX) are established based on the criterium which requires the collective F2nR2 RFLP pattern of any new group representative has a similarity coefficient of <0.85 with that of all previously recognized 16Sr groups [ 94 ] ( Supplementary Table S1 ).…”
Section: Phytoplasma Classification: 16sr Group/subgroup Classificati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phytoplasma" species have been described (IRPCM, 2004;Kirdat et al, 2020;Naderali et al, 2017;Rodrigues Jardim et al, 2020;Šafářová et al, 2016;Zhao et al, 2021). Nevertheless, the phytoplasma lineage is a highly diverse monophyletic group (Gupta et al, 2018;Zhao et al, 2015), having been classified into 36 groups, and more than 150 subgroups based on distinct 16S rRNA gene restriction fragment length polymorphism patterns and sequencing (Lee et al, 1998;Naderali et al, 2017;Rodrigues Jardim et al, 2020;Seemüller et al, 1998;Wei et al, 2007;Zhao et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%