2022
DOI: 10.47065/josyc.v3i4.2133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Candlestick Patterns Recognition using CNN-LSTM Model to Predict Financial Trading Position in Stock Market

Abstract: Investors need analytical tools to predict the price and to determine trading positions. Candlestick pattern is one of the analytical tools that predict price trends. However, the patterns are difficult to recognize, and some studies show doubts regarding the robustness of the recognizing system. In this study, we tested the predictive ability of candlestick patterns to determine trading positions. We use Gramian Angular Field (GAF) to encode candlestick patterns as images to recognize 3-hour and 5-hour of 6 c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification results have an accuracy rate of 90.72% and a precision of 87.69%. In this section, the researcher compared the accuracy results between the SVM method that was carried out by researchers with CNN and CNN-LSTM, which was carried out in the study [14], which can be seen in Figure 7. It can be seen in Figure 7 that SVM has a better accuracy rate than CNN, with an accuracy rate of 60%, and the combination of CNN and LSTM, with an accuracy rate of 82.7%, was carried out by [14].…”
Section: Figure 5 Svm Training Results In 3d Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The classification results have an accuracy rate of 90.72% and a precision of 87.69%. In this section, the researcher compared the accuracy results between the SVM method that was carried out by researchers with CNN and CNN-LSTM, which was carried out in the study [14], which can be seen in Figure 7. It can be seen in Figure 7 that SVM has a better accuracy rate than CNN, with an accuracy rate of 60%, and the combination of CNN and LSTM, with an accuracy rate of 82.7%, was carried out by [14].…”
Section: Figure 5 Svm Training Results In 3d Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the model that has been made is measured using a confusion matrix. Table 1 shows the classification results represented as True Positive (TP), True Negative (TN), False Positive (FP), and False Negative (FN) [14]. : negative data are classified as positive data False Negative (FN) : positive data that is classified as negative data Accuracy is the degree of closeness between actual data and predictive data.…”
Section: Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation