2021
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2021.3065918
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CANet: Context Aware Network for Brain Glioma Segmentation

Abstract: The version in the Kent Academic Repository may differ from the final published version. Users are advised to check http://kar.kent.ac.uk for the status of the paper. Users should always cite the published version of record.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results presented here are in the same range of reported findings of studies that used additional contextual information during model training. Overall, the reported results in literature and the ones obtained in this study show that the inclusion of context-awareness, by means of model architecture changes or additional information as input to the network, has marginal or no improvement on glioma segmentation [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. This should not discourage future research on the topic, but instead promote studies that exploit contextual information for brain tumor segmentation by other approaches and perhaps a combination of the currently implemented methods, i.e., context-aware blocks and additional contextual information as input to the network.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results presented here are in the same range of reported findings of studies that used additional contextual information during model training. Overall, the reported results in literature and the ones obtained in this study show that the inclusion of context-awareness, by means of model architecture changes or additional information as input to the network, has marginal or no improvement on glioma segmentation [ 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. This should not discourage future research on the topic, but instead promote studies that exploit contextual information for brain tumor segmentation by other approaches and perhaps a combination of the currently implemented methods, i.e., context-aware blocks and additional contextual information as input to the network.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…A number of attempts have been made to evaluate the impact of the introduction of context-aware blocks in the model architecture on brain tumor segmentation [ 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 ]. For example, Pei et al [ 19 ] used a context-aware deep neural network which thanks to a context encoding module between the encoder and the decoder part of the network, helped in overcoming the class imbalance problem that challenges brain tumor segmentation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variations of 3D U-Net were proven effective in 3D graphical information extraction from brain MRI images [22], [23], [24]. Recently, the contextual information of tumors and surroundings were modeled in a feature interaction graph to optimize latent feature representation [19]. Despite growing evaluation results, voxel ambiguity remains a challenging problem in brain glioma segmentation, which has yet to be solved.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ground-truth annotations contain healthy tissues, enhancing tumor (ET), whole tumor (WT), and tumor core (TC). We followed pre-processing steps in [19] and performed five-fold cross-validation with a random division.…”
Section: Experiments a Dataset And Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation