2023
DOI: 10.3390/ani13162612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine Babesiosis Caused by Large Babesia Species: Global Prevalence and Risk Factors—A Review

Abstract: Canine babesiosis is a disease caused by protozoan pathogens belonging to the genus Babesia. Four species of large Babesia cause canine babesiosis (B. canis, B. rossi, B. vogeli, and the informally named B. coco). Although canine babesiosis has a worldwide distribution, different species occur in specific regions: B. rossi in sub-Saharan Africa, B. canis in Europe and Asia, and B. coco in the Eastern Atlantic United States, while B. vogeli occurs in Africa, southern parts of Europe and Asia, northern Australia… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 314 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the ticks were frequently still alive when reaching the laboratory, room temperature transport might have affected DNA quality in cases of dead ticks, so the Babesia prevalence may have been underestimated. In previous studies from other European countries, prevalence values varying from 0 to 82.6% were reported (summarized by Zygner et al, 2023 ), although vast differences in sampling size and geographical extent of the studies as well as different molecular detection methods make direct comparisons difficult. Even in countries considered endemic for canine babesiosis, large regional differences in prevalence rates were recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the ticks were frequently still alive when reaching the laboratory, room temperature transport might have affected DNA quality in cases of dead ticks, so the Babesia prevalence may have been underestimated. In previous studies from other European countries, prevalence values varying from 0 to 82.6% were reported (summarized by Zygner et al, 2023 ), although vast differences in sampling size and geographical extent of the studies as well as different molecular detection methods make direct comparisons difficult. Even in countries considered endemic for canine babesiosis, large regional differences in prevalence rates were recorded.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%