2017
DOI: 10.1561/1100000064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine-Centered Computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ACI, researchers have sought to discover a dog's interactions by studying the dog but this is a very incomplete science (Geurtsen, Lamers, & Schaff, 2015;Mancini, 2016;Zeagler et al, 2016). There may be possibilities to make a reasonable guess at a dog's intentions in systems in which the dog is trained, as suggested by Freil et al (2017).…”
Section: System: Doggyvisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ACI, researchers have sought to discover a dog's interactions by studying the dog but this is a very incomplete science (Geurtsen, Lamers, & Schaff, 2015;Mancini, 2016;Zeagler et al, 2016). There may be possibilities to make a reasonable guess at a dog's intentions in systems in which the dog is trained, as suggested by Freil et al (2017).…”
Section: System: Doggyvisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal-computer interaction (ACI) research explores how animals interact with computing systems and how we can design these systems with animals in mind [19]. ACI systems have been used to measure an animal's experience towards interfaces [1,2,13,15,23,54], to develop new methods to measure and quantify an animal's use of computers [8,20] and to generate theories regarding how we can scope an animal's interactions with computers [12,53]. ACI research covers a multitude of animal users in various situations: e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The feedback loop presented in Figure 1 has also been modelled by Freil et al [32], who also extended from Norman's [29] gulfs towards a dog computing training scenario. Unlike as described here, Freil et al [32] considered the model to be fully closed. Our view, in this paper, is that for the gulf of evaluation to have execution errors such as slips and mistakes, this requires specific knowledge of the animal's intentions.…”
Section: What Is Interaction?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our view, in this paper, is that for the gulf of evaluation to have execution errors such as slips and mistakes, this requires specific knowledge of the animal's intentions. This literature review therefore considers the animal's intentions (as termed by Freil et al [32]) to be human interpretations (as noted within the gulf of evaluation above) of the animal's behaviour.…”
Section: What Is Interaction?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation