2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.08.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Canine dental pulp and umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells as alternative sources for cell therapy in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors revealed that the both DLA matched and mismatched allogenic transplantation are safe and effective for pulp regeneration due to the lack of signs for toxicity and the generation of pulp-like tissues 12 weeks post-transplantation (202). The results are supported by another study revealing canine DPSCs do not express HLA-DR (similar to DLA Class II in dogs) by flow cytometry (49). In addition, one study explored the blood type-and breed-associated immune reaction on allogenic transplantation in equines.…”
Section: Oral Hard Tissue Engineering In An Animal Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors revealed that the both DLA matched and mismatched allogenic transplantation are safe and effective for pulp regeneration due to the lack of signs for toxicity and the generation of pulp-like tissues 12 weeks post-transplantation (202). The results are supported by another study revealing canine DPSCs do not express HLA-DR (similar to DLA Class II in dogs) by flow cytometry (49). In addition, one study explored the blood type-and breed-associated immune reaction on allogenic transplantation in equines.…”
Section: Oral Hard Tissue Engineering In An Animal Modelmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Many studies also reported confirmational expression of pluripotency regulators and proliferative marker either as in genes or proteins, e.g., SRY-box transcription factor (TF) 2 (SOX2), REX1 TF (REX1), octamer-binding TF 4 (OCT4), and homeobox TF Nanog (NANOG), and proliferation marker Ki67 antigen (Ki67), respectively (40)(41)(42). In addition, this literature review presented the results of MSC surface markers both from flow cytometry and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) results, including CD146 (MSC multipotency), CD44 (cell-matrix interaction), CD29 (cell adhesion), CD73 (cell migration and anti-inflammatory property) CD90 (cell adhesion, migration, homing, proliferation, apoptosis, and differentiation), CD105 (cell migration, proliferation, and differentiation), and CD45 (hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) marker) (43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49).…”
Section: Oral Tissue Originsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) was performed to analyze the morphology of DPSCs using the fixation, dehydration, and metallization protocol described earlier (2.4.2). Osteogenic differentiation was quantified following the protocol described in Utumi et al 2021 [ 33 ]. The samples were washed with PBS (Gibco TM , Grand Island, NY, USA) and distilled water and fixed with 100% ethanol (Merck, Germany) for 15 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the quantification of adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation, the absorbance was measured by spectrophotometry [ 81 ]. Cells induced to undergo adipogenic differentiation and control cells were washed three times with PBS and fixed with 4% PFA (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) for 15 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%